Search

  • Re: so strange

    Well, maybe you're right. But he was writing about the BioShock DX 10 features like they were some improvements : Quote 1 : " The new DX10 enhancements include the use of dynamic water ripples, soft edges for particles, and crisper shadow edges" Quote 2 : " The last and least noticeable image quality difference between DX9 and DX10
    Posted to Gaming (Forum) by sebastian___ on Sun, Oct 7 2007
  • Re: so strange

    I'm talking about a single review : "The State of DirectX 10 - Image Quality & Performance" - written by (I think) a single reviewer/writer. And it's clearly a contradiction, because one minute he said ..." in BioShock the shadows are better because are sharp" , then the next minute he says : "Call of Juarez's
    Posted to Gaming (Forum) by sebastian___ on Sun, Oct 7 2007
  • so strange

    you guys are so weird. First you say that in BioShock the shadows are better because are sharp and crips. Which is weird as everybody knows that soft shadows are desirable because are more similar with reality. And games makers struggle to offer soft shadows. - And then you said "Call of Juarez's DX10 mode offers softer, more natural looking
    Posted to Gaming (Forum) by sebastian___ on Sun, Oct 7 2007
Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | More Search Options