Are you interested in testing out pre-release versions of OS X, but don't develop? Don't fret: Apple's just loosened the restrictions on its beta OSes, and now everyone is free to participate.
This move is substantial for Apple, as it's traditionally been quite strict about what beta software reaches the public - and here, we have an entire OS. Previously, developer accounts priced at $99/yr were required to access these special builds, so it's clear that Apple has reached the point where it believes more people testing = less bugs at launch.
Giving consumers access to beta OSes isn't a new idea - it's been de facto for Linux for as long as I can remember, and even Microsoft's been in on the action with recent Windows releases. For consumers, it means accessing the latest and greatest early - albeit with potential side-effects - and for companies like Apple, it means a more refined OS at launch.
While Apple fans haven't necessarily been plagued with bug-ridden OS X versions at launch, there have been some bugs that lingered through the private beta stage that have ended up driving people bonkers after launch. With Mavericks, a bizarre but simple bug with Mail made working with email a tedious task for some. With public betas, bugs like these, which are much easier to spot with more hands in the jar, should be ironed out in time for launch.
Nonetheless, users interested in taking pre-release OS X builds for a spin can sign-up for the free Beta Seed Program and download a small app which will cause the updater to begin looking for beta updates. If there's a "gotcha", it's that participation requires Mavericks, and presumably will always require the latest official release of OS X at that moment in time when a pre-release build becomes available.
Yeah... That's a pretty rigid "gotcha".
A public BETA test is a good idea. As stated, they'll find and conquer many more bugs with everyone testing it out as a pre-release version.
Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.
"and even Microsoft's been in on the action with recent Windows releases." Hmm recent, anyone remember Windows Chicago aka Win95 or Nashville aka NT4.0, how about the NT5 public beta (aka Windows 2000) seems they've been doing it for a long time to me. Still I say test with a virtual machine so you don't screw up anything important.
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2014 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms