Review: Samsung Galaxy S4 Active, a Rugged, High-End Alternative

rated by 0 users
This post has 2 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,744
Points 1,209,935
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Thu, Aug 8 2013 12:29 PM
Considering just how much we all rely on smartphones every day, they’re shockingly fragile. All it takes is one quick drop or spilled drink to end in disaster for your expensive gadget. For as quickly as phone technology is advancing, durability for many smartphones has remained a problem. That’s where Samsung hopes to make some waves with their latest handset, the Galaxy S4 Active.

The formula is simple: take the tried and true Galaxy S4, make a few tweaks here and there to ruggedize it and you have the Galaxy S4 Active. It’s a slight bit thicker and heavier and the rear has a rubber texture top and bottom but otherwise it feels just like any other GS4 and it performs like one too...

Internally, we’re looking at pure Galaxy S4, which also means you get Android 4.2.2 with Samsung’s TouchWiz skin. If you’ve read our original review of the Galaxy S4 you’ll know we found it to be an excellent phone that’s among the fastest we’ve ever tested and that holds true with the Active as well. 

Read-on for our quick-take review with a hands-on demo where the Galaxy S4 gets wet and wild!
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,692
Points 55,940
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: United States, Massachusetts
Dave_HH replied on Fri, Aug 9 2013 11:30 PM

I love this phone. This is going to be my personal phone I think very soon. I even like the blue back casing for some odd reason. :)

Editor In Chief

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,494
Points 47,210
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Metropolis
Super Dave replied on Sat, Aug 10 2013 12:15 AM

I agree - that is a very nice phone. I've been thinking of purchasing an S4, and now this HH article has me wanting to take a look at the S4 Active. Good timing for this story! I recently read another article Samsung Resorts To Trickery To Boost Galaxy Benchmarks and now I'm wondering if the benchmarks posted in the HH article are relevant.Sad 

 SPAM-posters beware! ®

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS