FTC Launches ‘Reclaim Your Name’ Campaign to Allow Consumers Visibility on Data Collection and Use

rated by 0 users
This post has 1 Reply | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,699
Points 1,207,625
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Thu, Jun 27 2013 12:34 PM
It’s no secret that companies collect information about you and sell it for advertising purposes. What is secret is the data that has been collected – you generally can’t see what data brokerages have on you, which means you don’t have a chance to pull data that you don’t want them to share. You also don’t have the option to correct mistakes. A member of the FTC is proposing an initiate that will help you get a look at what these companies know about you: the good, the bad, and the just plain wrong.

FTC Launches ‘Reclaim Your Name’ Campaign to Allow Consumers Visibility on Data Collection and Use
Image credit: Icanhazcheeseburger.com

FTC Commissioner Julie Brill announced the “Reclaim Your Name” proposal at the 23rd Computers Freedom and Privacy Conference in Washington, D.C. yesterday. Brill points out that the wrong info could lead to discrimination or just misinformed decisions by the companies you interact with. If Brill’s plan is enacted, you’ll be able to view the policies of data brokerages and check out your own data so you can challenge bad information. Given that data collection is inherently difficult to stop, pushing for transparency seems like an idea that could get some traction – particularly because it’s coming from the FTC.
  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 36
Points 240
Joined: Jul 2012
Location: Massachusetts
dnw1962 replied on Thu, Jun 27 2013 8:32 PM

I think this is a good start. I would like them to have the data brokerages send out a once a year email to anyone whose info they have sold in the previous year that includes a link to see what they have. Then maybe a postcard campaign to those they have no email address for. The latter may be a tough sell due to the postage costs but mass mailing of post cards are very inexpensive. If such rules were enforced they could easily justify passing on such costs.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (2 items) | RSS