Firefox Moves Forward with Plans For Do Not Track Blocking By Default

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,814
Points 1,213,600
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Sat, Jun 22 2013 1:13 PM

As we discussed last month, Mozilla postponed the introduction of automatic third-party cookie blocking in its Firefox Web browser, citing the obvious: it was too hasty in its decision. Well, that hastiness appears to have worn off, as now, the company has plans to rollout the do not track change to Firefox in the months ahead (exactly how many months isn't noted).

You might imagine that not everyone is happy about this move, and of them all, the vocal majority are advertisers. Advertisers can make use of cookies to track where the user visits in order to deliver more relevant advertising. Have you ever looked up a product at Amazon and then saw an ad for it on another site? Cookies are to thank. Google is likely the best--known advertiser to use these practices. I returned to playing Trion Worlds' Rift after it went free-to-play a couple of weeks ago, and ever since, I've seen ads for it on many different websites - essentially, any site that runs Google's ads.

It's clear that cookie use for this purpose is widespread, and though I hate functionality being taken away by default like this, I do love Mozilla's stance on customer safety and security. I do still stand by what I said last month, however:

"The best solution, to me, is to have cookies enabled by default, but present the user with information on the first browser boot about what cookies are, how they can be harmful, and then let them decide whether or not they should disable them. If they do disable them, let them enable them on a per-site basis."

Chances are that last point will happen anyway, similar to how the popular AdBlock plugin allows those who want to support certain websites to toss it onto the whitelist.

This move by Mozilla is an interesting one for a number of reasons; the main one: it's doesn't own an advertising network. By contrast, Google and Microsoft do, so it seems highly unlikely that either one of these companies will make the same move as Mozilla anytime soon for Chrome and Internet Explorer, respectively,, if ever.

  • | Post Points: 35
Not Ranked
Posts 40
Points 260
Joined: Mar 2011
OOs replied on Sat, Jun 22 2013 2:37 PM


  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,702
Points 55,905
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: United States, Massachusetts
Dave_HH replied on Sat, Jun 22 2013 6:26 PM

Yeah, I just wish Firefox wasn't so buggy. It crashes the most of any that I run.

Editor In Chief

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,114
Points 11,290
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
CDeeter replied on Sat, Jun 22 2013 8:14 PM

Your using it the wrong way. lol

Seriously, I can't say that I've experienced that.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 636
Points 5,710
Joined: Sep 2012
Location: Canada
RWilliams replied on Sat, Jun 22 2013 11:21 PM

I've found the same thing... it was one of the reasons I moved over to Chrome a couple of years ago. But now Chrome is giving me a number of issues like that also =/

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS