Whoops! Intel Passed On The Original iPhone Design

rated by 0 users
This post has 3 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,744
Points 1,210,025
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Fri, May 17 2013 12:26 PM
Today is outgoing Intel CEO Paul Otellini’s last day at the company, and although he’s left the company better off than when he found it, in an interview with The Atlantic he let slip one regret he had from his tenure--Intel could have made the chips for the iPhone.

Apparently, Apple approached Intel about making chips for the then-unknown device, and Otellini said that although his gut was telling him to dive in, he couldn’t see how it would be profitable for Intel.

“The thing you have to remember is that this was before the iPhone was introduced and no one knew what the iPhone would do... At the end of the day, there was a chip that they were interested in that they wanted to pay a certain price for and not a nickel more and that price was below our forecasted cost.” He didn’t believe they could make up the cost in volume, but of course as history has borne out, iPhone sales volume was exponentially greater than most anyone thought.

iPhone 5

"We ended up not winning it or passing on it, depending on how you want to view it”, he added. “And the world would have been a lot different if we'd done it.”

Otellini passing on having a part in the iPhone was a big whiff (especially in light of Intel’s continued struggles in that market), and it makes for some great tech lore, but at the end of the day, Otellini had a remarkable run as Intel chief. During his time at the helm, he helped the company grow its business from $34 billion to $58 billion.
  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,771
Points 105,115
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
realneil replied on Fri, May 17 2013 9:29 PM

Yeah, that's a big, fat whoops if there ever was one!

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 93
Points 800
Joined: Jul 2012
Shadizzle replied on Sat, May 18 2013 12:15 AM


  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 568
Points 5,155
Joined: Nov 2010
Location: Harker Heights

Not stated here but the chip wouldn't have been x86, it would have been the XScale. Actually to this day Intel still holds an ARM architectural level license.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS