iPhone 6 Rumored to Have 4.5-inch Retina Display, Edge to Edge Glass

rated by 0 users
This post has 3 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,393
Points 1,192,520
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Mon, May 13 2013 11:09 AM
With each passing moment, we get closer to Apple's next iPhone launch, which is made even more dramatic by Apple's desperate need for a design win. It's not that Apple will go out of business if the next iPhone is a flop, but with Samsung gaining so much market share and BlackBerry's recent reemergence as a viable platform, along with new Windows Phone devices, the iPhone 6 really needs to knock users' socks off. Will it?

Time will tell, but if marketing images posted to turn out to be true, there's going to be some interesting things to discuss in regards to the iPhone 6. The biggest potential talking point is that of a true edge-to-edge 4.5-inch Retina-class display that extends beyond where the bezels would typically be on each side of the phone.

"The only way to create a true edge-to-edge display is to remove the edge altogether," the supposed marketing tagline reads.

iPhone 6

One of the slides places the iPhone 6 next to the iPhone 5 and points out, "Your eyes will notice the difference but your hands won't." in the comparison shot, you can see that the iPhone 6 has a longer and wider touchscreen display compared to the iPhone 5, though both devices are the same length and height.

Apple's also (supposedly) marketing a new aluminum-carbon fiber unibody enclosure that's 40 percent lighter and 60 percent stronger. One of the upsides to this hybrid design is that it shouldn't shatter or break if dropped, a trait that could have a negative impact on the case industry.

As for hardware specs,'s slides show two 2.8Ghz quad-core A7 processors, 4GB of RAM, 4.5-inch display with a 754x1296 resolution, 8MP FaceTime camera, 20.2MP rear-facing camera with 2K video sensor, and various other odds and ends. Storage capacities include 16GB ($0), 64GB ($199), 128GB ($299), and 256GB ($399).

Also on tap (according to the slides, which could be Photoshopped) is an iPhone Mini that's the same size as an iPhone 4S. Other than the physical size, not much else is known about the device. Interestingly, the slide capitalizes the "M" in "iPhone Mini," whereas Apple uses a lowercase "m" in marketing its iPad mini device, a potential sign that this is all wishful thinking.
  • | Post Points: 50
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,036
Points 9,635
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: LA, CA
sevags replied on Mon, May 13 2013 4:04 PM

The reason I don't believe this rumor is the "16gb ($0)" I don't think apple would give us this option. A free iphione6 with contract? Nearly everyone would take this option including myself. I have had the smallest storage available out of the release models since the 3g except my 4g had 32gb more than half of which I never used and switched back to a 16gb for my iphone5. I highly doubt apple will give us a $0 option on a few flagship phone unfortunately.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 354
Points 3,075
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Canada

Well, I think I like this look, but it would most likely break easier. Does this also line up with their new "Curved battery " patent that was recently filed?

Anyway, it's just another iPhone, with updated specs... Its looking fairly powerful

PC Specs:

  • AMD Athlon 64 x2 6400+  Cooled by a Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus (push-pull)
  • 2GB DDR2
  • MSI Radeon HD 6450 2GB
  • Stock Dell motherboard
  • 250Gb HDD
  • XFX Pro Core edition 650W PSU
  • Stock Dell inspiron case


  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 468
Points 7,045
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: United States
AjayD replied on Tue, May 14 2013 2:31 AM

"754x1296 resolution, 8MP FaceTime camera, 20.2MP rear-facing camera"

No, no, and no. When Apple decides to come out with a larger screen for the iPhone, I very much doubt that it won't be full HD considering that is the new standard. Also, camera specs like these in an iPhone are probably about 2 years away.


***** Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted. *****

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS