Apple Patent Award Slashed By Almost Half

rated by 0 users
This post has 2 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,334
Points 1,191,115
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Fri, Mar 1 2013 9:16 PM
"Not so fast, buster." Those words probably weren't uttered in public during the Samsung v. Apple trials, but that's the feeling we're getting given the latest announcement in the saga. U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh just cut down Apple's massive $1.05 billion victory against Samsung. In the patent case, she whacked around 45% of the penalty, reducing the jury's damages award by an astonishing $450.5 million. Why? According to Koh, the jury "based its award for 14 Samsung products on an incorrect legal theory."

That's incredibly great news for Samsung, and slightly damaging news for Apple. In order for Samsung to get the damages reduced again, however, an all new trial / appeal is likely to be required. Needless to say, these two aren't about to give up the fight just yet, but one thing's for sure: Samsung's potential debt just got a lot less.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,053
Points 60,715
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
3vi1 replied on Sat, Mar 2 2013 12:09 PM

By the time this is all said and done, Samsung is going to owe Apple $52.37.

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?


  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,683
Points 104,320
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
realneil replied on Sun, Mar 3 2013 12:10 AM

If that,......

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS