AMD Puts Brave Face On New GlobalFoundries Agreement

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 24,877
Points 1,116,465
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Thu, Dec 6 2012 8:24 PM
AMD announced late today that it's reached a new wafer supply agreement (WSA) with GlobalFoundries. This is the second time AMD has renegotiated the agreement this year, and while the new arrangement offers Sunnyvale some needed flexibility, it carries further penalties as well.

First, a few quick explanations. The WSA governs the purchase and manufacture of microprocessors. AMD agrees to buy a certain number of wafers from GF per quarter and it negotiates payment for those wafers in several different ways. In 2011, AMD and GF agreed that Sunnyvale only had to pay GlobalFoundries for fully functional chips. At the time, GlobalFoundries was having problems ramping Llano. This agreement heavily favored AMD by ensuring that the company wasn't stuck buying entire wafers of non-functional product. The 2012 and new 2013 agreements mandate a take-or-pay arrangment in which AMD either buys GF's product or pays the company a provisional amount in exchange for not purchasing.

The Big Ugly

There's no way to sugarcoat the "ouch" factor on this. Previously, AMD expected to buy $500M worth of wafers from GF in Q4 2012. It has slashed this amount to $115M. That doesn't mean AMD's sales in Q4 will be ~22% of normal. Remember, it takes time for the wafers the company buys in any given quarter to be turned into processors.

What it does mean, however, is that AMD is taking drastic steps to prevent the sort of inventory buildup that left it no choice but to take a hefty writedown in Q3. The CPU designer is trying to spin the situation as a positive, since the combined cost of its $115M worth of wafers and $320M penalty payment to GF only works out to $435M as opposed to the $500M it expected to spend, but this isn't a good sign.

The APU design firm announced several other cost-saving measures, including R&D cost reductions of $20M per quarter. Previously, those dollars went to the custom R&D work GF did for AMD and the SOI production lines it maintained. AMD intends to transition to standard bulk silicon for future products and won't need to invest in this segment the same way.

Company executives reiterated that they intend to return to positive cash flow by the second half of next year, but were mum on the particulars of how this would be accomplished. Previous statements have indicated that AMD needs to maintain between $700M and $1.1B in cash per quarter to meet its ongoing need, and the firm believes it can still do this under the new arrangement.

GlobalFoundries and AMD remain intimately dependent on each other, but it's hard not to think that GF has taken AMD to the cleaners this past year. In March, AMD announced that it would be paying GF $730M and giving up its share of the company. Today's penalty means that AMD's erstwhile foundry division has pocketed over a billion dollars worth of penalty payments from a partner that can't really afford to pay them.
  • | Post Points: 50
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 354
Points 3,075
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Canada

I'm glad they are making up a new agreement. Hopefully, the silicon lottery will be strong with this one >:) (Had to XD)

Anyway, they really need to get things going, but the last thing they need to do is blow the last of their money in one place, so I suppose there is a bit of a bite to this as well.

PC Specs:

  • AMD Athlon 64 x2 6400+  Cooled by a Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus (push-pull)
  • 2GB DDR2
  • MSI Radeon HD 6450 2GB
  • Stock Dell motherboard
  • 250Gb HDD
  • XFX Pro Core edition 650W PSU
  • Stock Dell inspiron case


  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,016
Points 10,925
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Mcallen, Texas
OSunday replied on Fri, Dec 7 2012 12:01 AM

Sounds like their taking a big hit up front to avoid an even bigger hit later down the line but this isn't a good sign for AMD whose been struggling so hopefully they'll be able to turn things in the right direction with this game plan but I don't think any positives changes that could come will be any time soon.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 756
Points 7,635
Joined: Nov 2012
Location: Dallas, Tx
Dorkstar replied on Fri, Dec 7 2012 10:33 AM

Isn't a good sign for AMD?  They are doing something to turn themselves back into a profitable company!  Look at hostess, they just expected the unions to give in, and the unions expected the company to give in.  NOW WE GOT NO TWINKIES!

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,016
Points 10,925
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Mcallen, Texas
OSunday replied on Fri, Dec 7 2012 9:18 PM

It's good that their trying to turn themselves back into a profitable company but the fact they have to do something as drastic as spend 400+ mil on no product to get out of avoid having to spend 500mil on product is a bad omen :(

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,071
Points 10,850
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
CDeeter replied on Sat, Dec 8 2012 8:44 AM

Really GF expects AMD to pay a penalty for not taking bad chips? That's bull! Does anybody else work this way in the industry?

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS