Shortcuts

Apple Pulls Java From OS X Amidst Security Risks

rated by 0 users
This post has 1 Reply | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,710
Points 1,208,340
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Sat, Oct 20 2012 10:46 AM
Believe it or not, but Macs are susceptible to security vulnerabilities too, and perhaps erring on the side of caution, Apple has begun removing dated versions of Oracle's Java software from OS X when Mac users upgrade to the latest release.

"Java for OS X 2012-006 delivers improved security, reliability, and compatibility by updating Java SE 6 to 1.6.0_37. This update uninstalls the Apple-provided Java applet plug-in from all web browsers," Apple stated on its support website. "To use applets on a web page, click on the region labeled 'Missing plug-in' to go download the latest version of the Java applet plug-in from Oracle."

Macs

Interestingly, Apple didn't specify exactly what prompted the change, and Oracle isn't commenting on it, either. However, Reuters reports the two companies came to an agreement two years ago that at some point Apple would no longer distribute Java software to Mac users, handing the responsibility over to Oracle. No date was announced at the time.

Java allows programmers to write a single set of code that can run on multiple platforms/browsers, hence why it's so popular. At the same time, some security researchers advise turning off Java when it's not needed, or even uninstalling it completely to reduce the risk of Java-based infections.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,054
Points 60,735
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Sat, Oct 20 2012 11:03 AM

>> Apple has begun removing dated versions of Oracle's Java software from OS X when Mac users upgrade to the latest release.

Capital idea. Canonical tried to do this once, and people got in an uproar (most didn't care though, since Oracle's craptastic Java is not installed by default on Ubuntu).

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (2 items) | RSS