Intel's next-generation CPU, codenamed Haswell, was the major star of IDF. One aspect of the chip we haven't talked about at length, however, is its emphasis on reduced power consumption. When Intel announced that its Ivy Bridge mobile products would target 17W for mainstream systems, it made headlines. Pushing Haswell down to 10W is an even greater achievement, but hitting these targets requires a great deal of collaboration and cooperation... Intel's Game Changer, One Size Fits All Haswell
You're right Joel, power considerations are going to steer the market of the future.
I wonder if the competition has any Rabbits in their hats?
Don't part with your illusions. When they are gone you may still exist, but you have ceased to live.
Haswell is looking to be a killer chip for sure.
Editor In Chiefhttp://hothardware.com
It was very interesting to read about new processor from Intel. I think it is good to reduce the power of CPU. I am looking forward to read next gen Intel CPU for desktop and next Extreme Edition Series from Intel
Not unless they can break the laws of physics.
This intel guy holding the CPU looks like he's passing something righteous!
I don't see where any changes to the laws of physics are necessary to make this happen. They are simply turning off circuitry when it's not being used and providing different levels of performance to meet varying demands. Balls out the chips still gonna suck power and dissipate heat, but when it's doing lighter tasks, it can turn parts of itself off or slow them way down that aren't being used and save power. The complexity of such circuits relative to the rest of the processor is probably fairly trivial. It is sad that they are focusing on one OS vendor, Microsoft, because Windows-8 frankly blows. I'd much rather see them do a good job of documenting so that Mac, Linux, BSD, and other OS's can ALL benefit from these capabilities.
Pushing Haswell down to 10W is an even greater achievement, but hitting these targets requires a great deal of collaboration and cooperation.
I work for Intel and they got it to 7W not 10. This is also public knowledge.
I'm writing a paper on this for my "Organizational Report Writing" class. The chip seems stellar.
This is all pretty impressive.
My Computer: CM HAF 932, I7-920, Asus Sabertooth X58, 12GB Corsair Dominator Ram, MSI 7850, Corsair 850W PSU
It sounds like although its power consumption is being decreased by a slight amount, the number Intel is reporting is correlated with what the CPU is doing while still being "on"It's good to see some improvements and that power consumption is dropping when it's in minimal use or idle but what's really important is finding a way to decrease power consumption in heavy top side loads since most people buy computers to use them, not try and keep them to minimal or idle use.
I was reading somewhere last night that with new architecture in mobile chips a laptop while im sure running at idle could keep a charge as long as 24+hrs. That to me is even more impressive than the preformance and integrated 4000 graphics aspects of haswell.
I read this is soldered in to the board at the OEM and has done away with the traditional socket . I think you get what they give you no choices.
I didnt see mention of socket type. Anyone?
Haswell's socket will be 1150.
I am looking forward to the x89 series CPUs. But I feel the z87s aren't really too exciting. No new innovation (except 64Gb dual channel capabilities) and the heat spreader will be what should have been on the z77 CPUs. I like Intel, but that was not a good move. It's almost like they did it on purpose! IMO, its not worth an upgrade unless if you feel 10% is a big enough advantage.
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2013 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms