Verizon Claims $5 Monthly Fee Necessary For Unlisted Number

rated by 0 users
This post has 2 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 25,826
Points 1,167,350
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Wed, Aug 15 2012 5:23 PM
We'd like to say we're surprised by Verizon's latest claims regarding fees, services, and ridiculous pricing, but after the "Share Everything" plans pegged the cost of a gigabyte of data at up to $50, we're immune to much of anything. A recent blog post at NetWorkWorld details one person's request for an explanation as to why having an unlisted phone number costs him $5/month. Verizon's answer: "The cost charged to offer unlisted phone numbers is chiefly systems and IT based." She goes on to claim that unlisted phone numbers require special service to make certain their information isn't stuffed into the details Verizon sells to everyone else.

Verizon's online customer service appears to have handled the question by copy-and-pasting every rote response in the employee handbook that contained the word "unpublished."

What this points to is the further monetization of individual privacy. Once upon a time, anyone who wanted to be in the phone book as anything more than a name and address had to pay for the privilege. Now, the phone company is essentially arguing that wanting notto have your data sold means you have to compensate them for the lost revenue, to the tune of an additional $60 a year. The scary part is that Verizon actually tops the list in customer service.



Verizon and Comcast have agreed in principle with a DOJ filing that seeks to limit the degree to which they may cross market to each other, and the company will rollout LTE service to 34 cities tomorrow. Hopefully that'll spark AT&T to push its own 3G rollouts -- the company claims to want to move off of 2G, but as an AT&T subscriber, Edge coverage is all I can get in rural New York State.

It's not that Verizon is evil -- to the contrary, the company has done some good work with its HopeLine app and participation in the struggle to end domestic violence and protect its victims. That work, however laudable, doesn't really change the fact that the company is overcharging its customers and trying to build a world in which it has the right to charge you for features that used to be free.
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 385
Points 3,845
Joined: Jun 2011
RTietjens replied on Wed, Aug 15 2012 9:27 PM

Please note that the law does not require that the phone be listed in the subscriber's name; so when you call Verizon to change your listing, use the name of a pet. If they balk, you can point out that they have no legal right to list your name nor to sell your name without your consent, and that you're perfectly willing to take them to court, in a class-action suit, to recover all profits they have made from selling your name and information in the past if that's what it takes to get them to use the name you prefer. It doesn't matter if you really intend to do it; it only takes one person to launch such a suit, and Verizon will be out billions of dollars in legal fees and damages.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 290
Points 2,255
Joined: Aug 2012

The only good thing abot verizon is their fiber optics internet. And thats it. Just like apple, wait theres nothing good about them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS