Broadcast TV on Your Phone? It's a Real Thing

rated by 0 users
This post has 10 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 24,884
Points 1,116,905
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Sat, Aug 4 2012 1:56 PM
Watching broadcast TV on a mobile device has been a consumer’s dream for years, starting way back when you could buy a handheld TV with long antennae like the Sony Watchman. Yet as our phones have evolved into small computing powerhouses, the concept of watching TV on one has become less about broadcast TV and more about streaming content via the Internet from sites like Netflix and Hulu.

In fact, the whole paradigm of “TV” as we know it is changing; satellite and cable distributors are sweating it out as on demand and streaming content available on the Internet threatens their entire business models, and as big players in the pay-TV industry throw public hissy fits at each other, more and more people are considering pulling the plug.

Sony Watchman
The Sony Watchman

Despite all that, free over-the-air broadcast TV remains intact (at least for now), and it appears as though it’s hitching its wagon to the mobile technology explosion.

Samsung and MetroPCS jointly announced the latest addition to the latter’s lineup of Android LTE-equipped smartphones with the new Samsung Galaxy S Lightray 4G. The device’s specs aren’t anything extraordinary--4.3-inch display, Android 2.3 (Gingerbread), 1GHz processor, and 8MP/1.3MP front/rear-facing cameras for $459--except for the fact that the Lightray will be packing Dyle mobile TV.
Samsung Galaxy Lightray 4G


The Dyle Mobile TV service delivers live, local OTA TV, and it’s a free add-on to the MetroPCS 4G service. Thus, owners of the Lightray with 4G service from MetroPCS in certain markets can whip out their phones wherever they are and watch locally broadcast TV.

It sounds awfully expensive to stream TV over 4G, but that’s just it--it’s not streaming. According to MetroPCS, the service works without consuming data, on a chunk of spectrum reserved specifically for TV.

However, that’s not the end of the story in regards to broadcast content. Samsung has been testing broadcast services over 4G LTE using evolved Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service (eMBMS), which reportedly enables more efficient use of network resources by enabling “carriers to adjust coverage and capacity as needed”, or so says the press release. Thus, even more of the content we consume could be coming through the same pipe, so to speak, instead of from a variety of sources.

What do you think? Is this the wave of the future or just a gimmick?
  • | Post Points: 140
Not Ranked
Posts 2
Points 10
Joined: Aug 2012

broadcast tv on cellphones has been available for like a decade in places like japan...

SO behind the curve

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 30
Points 150
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Estados Unidos

Nice Thanks for the info.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 191
Points 1,750
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Canada

I wouldn't call it a "wave" of the future but it certainly is handy. I can follow the Olympics with almost live coverage or soccer/football games. It's great!

"You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new."

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 619
Points 5,260
Joined: Dec 2011

In Canada, Bell has got you covered. 10 hours a month, get ten extra for five bucks. You pay, but it doesnt use your data!

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 191
Points 1,750
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Canada
InsideSin replied on Sat, Aug 4 2012 10:27 PM

Yep! I added it to my plan before they started advertising during the Olympics that you can watch it on your phone!

"You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new."

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 272
Points 2,170
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
karanm replied on Sat, Aug 4 2012 11:39 PM

yay Canadian peeps!! I have rogers, they have the same thing i believe but I haven't really looked into it. Rogers has had mytv I believe its called for a while.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,071
Points 10,850
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
CDeeter replied on Sun, Aug 5 2012 12:04 PM

No, not a gimmick at all. I think this idea has legs, long legs. Digital broadcast TV is big in my area. Currently I get 15 stations that cover ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, PBS, WB, UPN, 2 music channels and more. To have this available on my phone would be great. Hopefully more carriers will jump on this to here in the US.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,796
Points 45,500
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Sun, Aug 5 2012 12:33 PM

Much like I said in another post while a 7" might be ok for this I would still go for either a 10" or in a truly mobile sense the Galaxy note 5'3". I can watch on my Sensations 4'3" it just seems a little cramped and I think that inch would give it a lot.

 Machine name: rapid1
 Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7600) 
 System Model: Gigabyte X58A-UD5
 Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU         930  @ 2.80GHz (8 CPUs), ~3.6GHz
 Memory: Kingston 6144MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 501
Points 4,625
Joined: Dec 2011
Location: centennial park az
AKnudson replied on Sun, Aug 5 2012 10:45 PM

The transfer of Channel Based media to mobile phones isn't going to fully redeem the system. Historically they have 2 or 3 advantages over netflix and Hulu that are fast slipping away.

First- They can broadcast live coverage of sporting events or local news, Now so can the internet from each of the respective large nightly news channels.

Second- you get the movie much faster, netflix you have to wait for but Hulu Plus is much quicker and eliminates alot of the time delay.

Third- They are free simple as that. Netflix and Hulu have a hard time arguing with this last one, but with netflix costing about the equivalent of 2 cups of coffee a month its almost nothing, almost.

The advantages Netflix and Hulu have is their instant streaming ability, no more waiting for episodes to record, no more watching random episodes out of sequence. You watch the entire season easily from any device with an internet connection from anywhere in the world. (except maybe China)

What Hulu and Netflix don't have is sports, give them that and you put the nail in the coffin of local broadcast TV.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,796
Points 45,500
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Mon, Aug 6 2012 10:00 AM

Yeah AKnudson "the nail in the coffin" seems ever relevant at the least now. I know broadcast TV i general is suffering becuase I just don't see how they have even 3/4 much less 1/2 of the (advertising) market they did 5 years ago.

 Machine name: rapid1
 Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7600) 
 System Model: Gigabyte X58A-UD5
 Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU         930  @ 2.80GHz (8 CPUs), ~3.6GHz
 Memory: Kingston 6144MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (11 items) | RSS