TUL Unveils PowerColor PCS+ Votex II Series Videocards for "Enthusiasts Only"

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,190
Points 1,186,155
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Sat, Apr 14 2012 12:15 PM
TUL Corporation just recently announced a line of PowerColor graphics cards apparently designed for "enthusiasts only." It's the Vortex II series, which is the nomenclature TUL uses to describe PowerColor cards that feature a deluxe "Platinum Power Kit" design for improved power efficiency, stability, and overclocking ability, along with Vortex II cooling technology. TUL's Vortex II coolers consists of dual adjustable fans with perforated blades intended to optimize airflow and to do a better job at dissipating excessive heat.

There are two new cards as part of the Vortex II series, starting with the Powercolor PCS+ HD7870 Vortex II. This one boasts a core clockspeed of 1120MHz and 2GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 1250MHz on a 256-bit bus. Those are slightly higher clockspeeds than AMD's reference design, which calls for a 1000MHz engine clock and 1200MHz memory clock.


TUL also introduced the PowerColor PCS+ HD7970 Vortex II with an 1100MHz core clockspeed (up from 925MHz on reference cards) and 3GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 1425MHz (up from 1375MHz on reference cards) on a 384-bit bus. Both cards are equipped with multiple output options, including DL-DVI-I, SL-DVI-D, HDMI (x2), and a mini DisplayPort.

No word yet on price or availability.
  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,053
Points 60,715
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Sat, Apr 14 2012 4:29 PM

I can't escapte the feeling that "Enthusiast Only" is market-speak for "Ultra Expensive, but you'll buy it because it sounds exclusive". Enthusiasts would probably want the highest performing chipset of the moment... which is not what these guys are based upon - right?

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,652
Points 104,120
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Sat, Apr 14 2012 7:56 PM

GTX-680 is the one I want. Can't afford either one of them either.

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,594
Points 54,955
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: United States, Massachusetts
ForumsAdministrator
MembershipAdministrator
Dave_HH replied on Sat, Apr 14 2012 10:53 PM

3vi1, good to see you man. And I want two of these cards, preferably a paid of 680s.

Editor In Chief
http://hothardware.com


  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,830
Points 45,790
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Sat, Apr 14 2012 11:25 PM
OS:Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
MB:ASUS Z87C
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4770 ***
GPU:Geforce GTX 770 4GB
Mem:***ingston 16384MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,053
Points 60,715
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Sun, Apr 15 2012 7:35 PM

Nice to see you too Dave. I probably really should be nicer to companies using AMD chipsets... since they are the one company that actually has an open API for their cards and the open driver community. I guess past performance/experience still has me slightly biased against them.

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS