FAA Revisiting Policy Governing Electronic Devices on Flights

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 24,931
Points 1,118,345
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Mon, Mar 19 2012 3:01 PM
Please, please, please, for the love of all that is good and pure, let this report be true: Nick Bilton wrote on the New York Times Bits blog that an FAA representative told him that the agency is re-evaluating its policy on electronic devices on its flights. Specifically, he wrote:
When I called the F.A.A. last week to pester them about this regulation — citing experts and research that says these devices could not harm a plane — the F.A.A. responded differently than it usually does. Laura J. Brown, deputy assistant administrator for public affairs for the F.A.A., said that the agency has decided to take a “fresh look” at the use of personal electronics on planes.
Air travel is already a pain, between long drives to the airport, having to throw away hair gel or hand sanitizer because they’re in a bottle that’s 0.5 ounces too large, sitting around idly while waiting to board, and aircraft seats designed to only accommodate individuals under 5’4”, but being unable to use electronic devices for the long ascent and descent of the flight because they may interfere with the aircraft’s controls just takes the cake.



For one thing, if you’re on a short connecting flight, that gives you a very small window in which to use your electronic device. For another, nobody follows the rules anyway; if you’re on a flight with 75 people, there are likely 75 smartphones/tablets/ereaders that remain on throughout the flight.

Bilton notes that any possible changes are likely a ways off, as the FAA will have to do quite a bit of testing, and being a governmental agency, there will also be miles and miles of red tape. Indeed, according to the article, the FAA has to test each and every possible device (and even iterations of the same device!) individually before deciding whether or not it’s on the approved list.

We’re no airline mechanics around here, but that sounds insane.

Worse, there’s no indication that smartphones are in the running for approval; it’s only tablets for now, apparently.

We certainly appreciate the FAA’s thoroughness in ensuring our safety--the agency has done quite a bit to make air travel a very safe means of transportation--but we’re also keen to see the seemingly unfounded fears about electronics interfering with avionics waived.
  • | Post Points: 95
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,446
Points 102,230
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Mon, Mar 19 2012 8:26 PM

The solution is never to fly anywhere. Once all of the airlines go out of business, we can open go kart tracks on the runways,.......

Don't part with your illusions. When they are gone you may still exist, but you have ceased to live.

(Mark Twain)

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5
Joined: Aug 2013
star7690 replied on Tue, Aug 13 2013 3:41 PM

The post is written in very a good manner and it entails many useful information for me. I am happy to find your distinguished way of writing the post. research paper grading

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5
Joined: Aug 2013
AnnaSim replied on Thu, Aug 29 2013 3:39 AM

Interesting post and thank you for sharing. There are things here that I did not think before. Thanks to cool such a position that is very well written, we will take a lot of friends about it. Keep blogging. alke

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5
Joined: Jun 2013

I just got to this amazing site not long ago. I was actually captured with the piece of resources you have got here. Big thumbs up for making such wonderful blog page!

free electronic cigarette

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS