AMD Nearly Bought Nvidia, Could Be Building Next-Gen PlayStation GPU

rated by 0 users
This post has 2 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 24,884
Points 1,116,980
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2012 5:08 PM
When AMD held its Analyst Day a few weeks ago, the company focused on how it was fundamentally changing its approach to semiconductor research and product development. Years of attempting to compete with Intel drained company coffers and exposed it to tremendous competitive pressure. Consumers unquestionably profited -- Intel's prices for various parts dropped dramatically in the early 2000s as AMD entered specific markets -- but Sunnyvale took a ferocious beating in the process.

Forbes has published a major article on the company's turbulent last few years and current plans. It credits Dirk Meyer with saving the company after Hector Ruiz's tenure as CEO ended in mid-2009, but quotes no less a source than Jerry Sanders, AMD's founder, on why any attempt to branch into cell phones or netbooks would've been a bad move.  “Dirk was digging out of a deep hole,” Sanders told Forbes. “I think Dirk understood that when you’re in a deep hole you stop digging—it would have been a deeper hole if AMD had tried to branch into a new activity, like smartphones.” For the record, we thought exactly the same thing.

Several interesting tidbits have emerged as part of this investigation, including news that ATI wasn't AMD's preferred partner for a graphics merger back in 2005. The firm initially approached Nvidia regarding a potential merger. Talks stalled with Jen-Hsun Huang, Nvidia's CEO, insisted he be named CEO of the combined company. Ruiz went to ATI and got absolutely taken to the cleaners, AMD eventually wrote down half the $5.4B it paid for ATI (thus arguably proving Jen-Hsun's point).

Did Ruiz make the right call? It's hard to say. The ATI acquisition was badly botched; the capital AMD spent (and later wrote down) to acquire ATI was critically needed for fab improvements and product development. It took the combined company five years to deliver the first "Fusion" products when they initially promised to have hardware on the shelf within two.


Nvidia's G80 did a remarkably good job of ruining several years of ATI's life

Back then, AMD and Nvidia were critically linked; the latter's nForce chipsets were the preferred solution for AMD products. In 2005, ATI and Nvidia both reported a shade over $2B in revenue for the year. In 2011, Nvidia did $3.84B in business while AMD's graphics division sold $1.5B worth of GPUs. Hector's long-term vision was accurate, but the execution left much to be desired.

If rumors are to be believed, AMD's graphics revenue could be on the way up. Forbes is also claiming that AMD is hard at work on a GPU to power the next-generation PS3. If true, it would mean AMD would power at least two of the next three consoles; the Wii U is confirmed as relying on a Radeon GPU derived from the HD 4000 series. Given that AMD has also been named as supplying the XBox Next's GPU, could Sunnyvale have pulled a hat trick?

Maybe -- but chances are, it won't mean much to the company's bottom line.



Unlike the PS3, which began life with all the earnings potential of a dying Bantha, both the Xbox 360 and the Wii sold well from Day 1. The Wii, in particular, blew up sales charts -- at the end of June 2007, Nintendo had moved 9.27 million consoles. By June 2010, that number was up to ~74 million, an 8x increase in three years. Nintendo recognized record-smashing profits over this period, while AMD's graphics division struggled to break even. Console sales may create a halo effect around the company's graphics technology, but AMD's extremely aggressive pricing appears to have hamstrung its ability to profit off its own products. Whether Read will change this policy is yet unclear. We've critized the CEO's reliance on meaningless buzzspeak and his tendency to rely on a handful of beleagured adjectives, but that doesn't mean he lacks an overall strategy or the ability to inspire. After years of struggle, AMD deserves a moment in the sun.
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,236
Points 37,910
Joined: Mar 2010
AKwyn replied on Fri, Feb 24 2012 7:18 PM

Huh; I don't know why they didn't do it. I mean NVIDIA's expertise could of given AMD an upper hand (in microcomputing, which AMD falters at at the moment) and it certainly could of benefited AMD more then ATI. I guess they had their reasons for not allowing him to become CEO but he could of been a good CEO and he could of prevented the stuff that happened at AMD, stuff like awkward staff/CEO replacements and "Bulldozer". Don't get me wrong, AMD is doing well in graphics and they have managed to slowly curb the market with good GPU's but they could of had a winning combination with NVIDIA by their side.

Maybe AMD gaining market share with it's graphics is a good thing, they're trying to make the best of a bad situation by turning it around. Still, profits that aren't there with the big boys are cause for concern; so is money lost.

 

"The future starts with you; now start posting more!"

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 123
Points 910
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: Canada

Ruiz may have dug AMD in a hole somewhat, but I'm not sure letting Jen-Hsun become the CEO would have been a great move. I mean, NVIDIA's last financial report was not that great for a reason. AMD DID overpay for ATI though (this coming from a Canadian with a history of radeon cards). Hindsight is 20-20.

However, the new 'fusion' strategy looks interesting. AMD has never lacked good ideas, they have almost always sucked in the execution/implementation. If Read can correct this execution problem, they will make some good money.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS