MSI Ballyhoos 3DMark 11 World Record Set by X79A-GD65 (8D) Motherboard

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 25,865
Points 1,172,220
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Fri, Jan 20 2012 3:04 PM
Motherboard makers have long gone after the enthusiast crowd by implementing overclocking friendly features into their products, and these days companies get just as excited about benchmarking and OCing world records as end users do. Take MSI, for example, which is happy as can be that its X79A-GD65 (8D) was part of an overclocked system that set an official world record for the Physics portion of Futuremark's 3DMark 11 benchmark.

Singapore overclocker "Spyboy48" broke the record during an overclocking contest sponsored by MSI, Kingston, Enermax, and Cougar.


"The new record score, 19090, set with an Intel Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition processor and MSI X79A-GD65 (8D) motherboard is a great achievement in overclocking skill. At stock settings, a similar system would get a score of about 11000, so Spyboy48 improved the CPU performance of his system by almost 75 percent," MSI said in a statement.

MSI says eight different overclockers scored over 18,000 in the same benchmark, and seven out of the 10 Hall of Fame Physics scores came from this contest.
  • | Post Points: 65
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 495
Points 4,825
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Brighton, MA

I really don't see the point of overclocking with LN2 for some minutes.....

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 501
Points 4,625
Joined: Dec 2011
Location: centennial park az
AKnudson replied on Fri, Jan 20 2012 11:47 PM

well overclocking is like predicting the future, whatever the do overclocking then you know in 5 years you can do it normally.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 495
Points 4,825
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Brighton, MA

Maybe or maybe not, I don't see the point yet. why get too excited for some minutes at extreme overclock now if you say that those speeds wil remain permanent with some water cooling thats a different story.I have a qu estion why do they use ln2 which cool the cpu temps below 0 c isn'T THAT TOO MUCH? When the max temp could be ~70 why go that low

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 501
Points 4,625
Joined: Dec 2011
Location: centennial park az
AKnudson replied on Sat, Jan 21 2012 10:47 PM

the lower you go the less the friction will affect the speed, the colder the wire the easier for data to travel, also the longer the life of the cpu.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS