Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Sandy Bridge-E CPU Review

rated by 0 users
This post has 25 Replies | 4 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 25,805
Points 1,164,590
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2012 11:23 AM

Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Sandy Bridge-E CPU ReviewA few weeks back, we took a look at the Core i7-3960X, Intel’s first desktop processor to feature the company’s Sandy Bridge-E microarchitecture. If you're unfamiliar with the chip, Sandy Bridge-E is the ‘tock’ in Intel’s tick-tock release schedule cadence that bridges the gap between first-gen Sandy Bridge-based processors and next year’s Ivy Bridge microarchitecture. Sandy Bridge-E shares many of the same features of the original Sandy Bridge microarchitecture, but as the “E” denotes, SBE is a more extreme derivative, targeted at enthusiasts.

We briefly discussed the Core i7-3820 we’ll be showing you today in our Core i7-3960X coverage, but didn’t have a chip on hand for testing. The Core i7-3820 is based on the very same die as the higher-end Core i7-3960X, but two of its cores (and some cache) have been disabled...

Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Sandy Bridge-E CPU Review

  • | Post Points: 245
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,120
Points 12,940
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: East Coast

"I like that you pushed the 3820 to its limit in overclocking, I say that cause usually or always you are very conservative when it comes to that department. What I find odd is the power consumption numbers , Idle and Load results seem a little to high compared to other reviews."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,356
Points 48,595
Joined: Apr 2000
Location: United States, Connecticut
ForumsAdministrator
MembershipAdministrator
Marco C replied on Mon, Jan 16 2012 2:53 PM

With regard to power, my testbed still used a GTX 200 series card, which has much higher idle power than newer GPUs. The delta between idle and load should be similar, however.

Marco Chiappetta
Managing Editor @ HotHardware.com

Follow Marco on Twitter

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,120
Points 12,940
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: East Coast

Marco C:
The delta between idle and load should be similar, however.

"Yes, totally true. Thanks for the response. "

Edit:

Marco C:
With regard to power, my testbed still used a GTX 200 series card, which has much higher idle power than newer GPUs.

"Actually, I researched a bit, and I came to the conclusion that the higher consumption numbers are based on the Asus P9X79 Deluxe motherboard. Other reviews used a lower end Mobo like the DX79SI or the Asrock Extreme4-m. The extra bells and whistles in the Deluxe have a little more Watt usage which is highly justifiable."

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 13
Points 125
Joined: Feb 2010
Tobi-Saru replied on Mon, Jan 16 2012 4:01 PM

Great review, so excited about the stuff Intel has and will be putting out. I would like to point out though on the first page of the review it seems you listed the specs for the i7-3960 instead of the 3820.

Anyways, keep up the great in-depth reviews!

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 341
Points 4,490
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
slugbug replied on Mon, Jan 16 2012 4:49 PM

Wouldn't it be cool if the disabled cores and cache could be enabled like some AMD processors.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 495
Points 4,825
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Brighton, MA

no quicksync O_O using that amount of watts for the little performance gained over the 2700k?.....how come its not faster than the 2700k when in all your bench the 3820 had higher scores than the 2700k O_O

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,093
Points 38,115
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
acarzt replied on Mon, Jan 16 2012 10:19 PM

You guys listed the specs for the 3960x not the 3820 :-P

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,541
Points 54,450
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: United States, Massachusetts
ForumsAdministrator
MembershipAdministrator
Dave_HH replied on Tue, Jan 17 2012 10:39 AM

Corrected, thanks. Sorry for missing that.

Editor In Chief
http://hothardware.com


  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 495
Points 4,825
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Brighton, MA

No problem. acarzt and I, trying to correct  human mistakes, which is always good to notice and notify so people dont get confused :) good job on the review anyway I liked...Joined this website yesterday and noticing something and posting it just make me proud :)

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 495
Points 4,825
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Brighton, MA

Oh just noticed you live in  MA, Me too! are you  The owner of this site?

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 4
Points 35
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: MD, USA
nfscop replied on Tue, Jan 17 2012 2:23 PM

When will the 3820 be available?

Intel set the price at $285 but everyone seems to want to charge $315 for these things. It looks overpriced to me. It makes more sense to pick up a 2700 or 2600. The tiny bit of performance increase is not worth the cost and extra power consumption. Piledriver and Ivy Bridge are only months away too. Not sure what Intel is thinking here.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 123
Points 910
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: Canada

I don't know where this will fit.

For heavy-duty encoders/editors/content creators the 3900 series are the way to go(and even the 2700k will do well).

For 'regular" folks and gamers, an i52500k will do the job and if you want more performance an i72600k is there (no point in spending about $100 more for a speed bump in the 2700k)

I'm not happy bulldozer's bringing up the rear even in it's supposed strong points (threaded workloads) but Piledriver should go some way towards correcting that, if the notebook demos are anything to go by.

This is what happens when there's no real competition: Intel can release something to cover every concievable user type and price point, even when it makes little sense to do so.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 341
Points 4,490
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
slugbug replied on Wed, Jan 18 2012 5:35 PM

It looks like this will by my next CPU. I already have a MSI X79A-GD45 from a Facebook win and just ordered a Corsair Vengeance 4 x 4 GB ddr3-1600 kit.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,865
Points 29,645
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: United States, Connecticut

Would really like the unlocked 3930K but I might have to settle for this proc :) to go in that nice MSI X79 mobo.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,236
Points 37,910
Joined: Mar 2010
AKwyn replied on Wed, Jan 18 2012 11:37 PM

Great review; glad to know that the 4 core version of the 3930K is capable of performing with the big boys; you're right when you say that there's barely any difference between the X58 and the Z68 series, though the enthusiest will appreciate having any sort of power by their side and tons of high speed PCI-E ports.

 

"The future starts with you; now start posting more!"

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 11
Points 115
Joined: Jun 2011
xmd5 replied on Sun, Jan 22 2012 12:56 AM

Personally I was waiting for C2 stepping but the Core i7 3820 looks to be quite reasonable once its released. I still feel like X79 motherboards are missing features though. I’d like to see an updated chipset that has the features we were expecting out of the X79 (12 Intel SATA ports 3G + 6G, native Intel SRT and so on).

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 2
Points 10
Joined: Dec 2011

ha

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,571
Points 103,110
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Mon, Jan 23 2012 7:52 PM

cowboyspace:
are you  The owner of this site?

Look on the bottom,  at the very last sentence on every web page within HotHardware.

 

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,571
Points 103,110
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Mon, Jan 23 2012 9:40 PM

It looks like a heck of a nice way to go. The price is certainly right.

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 495
Points 4,825
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Brighton, MA

Ok I got it thanks you :)

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 24
Points 285
Joined: Dec 2011
JOliver replied on Tue, Jan 24 2012 9:49 PM

Pretty good, but the high cost of x79 platform veers me off from even considering the purchase.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 207
Points 1,845
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Erakith replied on Mon, Jan 30 2012 7:36 PM

Can someone tell my why I should consider a CPU like this over say.. a 2500k, or the upcoming 3570k, when my primary focus is gaming? It just strikes me as slight overkill.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,571
Points 103,110
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Tue, Jan 31 2012 12:41 AM

Erakith:
Can smeone tell my why I should consider a CPU like this over say.. a 2500k, or the upcoming 3570k, when my primary focus is gaming? It just strikes me as slight overkill.

You're right,....The i5-2500K will kick ass in a gaming rig with a good Z68 Mainboard. It can handily take on any game that's out there today.

Also,...look at the new Sapphire Radeon HD-7950 OC that was just released today. It's an awesome video card for the money.


Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5
Joined: Feb 2012
phred replied on Thu, Feb 23 2012 7:43 AM

This is interesting,but for my purposes it wouldn't be of benefit.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 20
Points 115
Joined: Sep 2011
LSanoy replied on Wed, Aug 1 2012 9:24 PM

good for a x79 setup :)

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (26 items) | RSS