this would have been really good for amd. hopefully they can get the deal for the next gen
CPU: e6400 @ 3.2 (H-50'd)MB: MSI p6nRAM: 4G adataGPU: GTS-450 and 8800GTS for PhysxHDD: WD 500G BlackPSU: 620W Corsair Mod.Case: 900-2 with 7 cathodes and AP-15sOS: W7 and Ubuntu
"Too bad for AMD, I really would like for them to finally move forward, but with Intel's chip performing superiority, ARM getting in the action, Nvidia in it with Kalel and Wayne, the future seems a little dark. Still, I think that the Llano platform as good and as successful as it has been, I would think that the source might be half accurate. I believe in that they were considered, but the power consumption + CPU performance just doesn't cut it in Mac Book Air standards, especially for the battery life."
To bad AMD couldnt get it together. This would have been huge for them in so many ways.
I really wish AMD would have gotten this account, their research department could use a boost. On the other hand I do feel that Llano is a better platform for the air, I wouldn't be surprised if they went with AMD in a future refresh of the air.
Now you're just mashing it!
well at least AMD wins at something.
I'm starting to think that maybe cutting a few positions may have been a bad decision. I mean if those people were essential to providing AMD with supply then they just cost themselves a pretty penny. I mean Llano is good for the Air, it may not be as better then Intel but at least AMD work hard to give their APU's respectable performance, it's not like they're going to perform badly enough for anybody to buy them...
If AMD has another chance at getting that deal then they should; after they manage to increase chip production. I mean maybe it's a bad decision to focus on Bulldozer but it's not a lost cause and they are working on a revision for increased performance...
"The future starts with you; now start posting more!"
If AMD had gotten the nod, would Apple be selling the MacBook Air at a lower price-point?
SPAM-posters beware! ®
I don't think so dave :D lol :P
I don't think so dave :D lol :P
Right Inspector. I mean there's just so many things that go into calculating the Apple tax. There's the Mac OS X preinstalled, the precious metals mined from the glorious mines of Apple used to make the MacBook Air, and the percentage of the purchase price that goes into the Steve Jobs Memorial Fund.
Note: I don't think of Steve Jobs highly even though I respect his ability to think of things we never thought of before and his dedication to pushing his company forward in terms of green usage... Personally I don't like the way he ran his empire, locked down his devices and used a business model which the average consumer didn't mind but the knowledgeable people minded a lot. I mean sure, he makes good devices but why does he feel like all of the devices need to go through them; I mean can't we do the stuff ourselves if we know how to? I mean sure, it's the same for other PC's but people know when they're not knowledgeable enough to tinker with their computers...
I may buy his biography... But only to give a review on it; I mean it'd be interesting to know the things that he did but all in all, don't think of him highly and even think that his death is overrated.
Man that sucks for AMD... sounds like they need a better sales person to convice people like Apple to use their chips. Most people would not have noticed a difference with what a Macbook Air is good for and Apple would have been able to make a higher profit in addition to providing AMD with a much needed boost in income.
This is AMD's fault. It's GlobalFoundries that couldn't get good enough yields. AMD is no going with TMSC instead of GF for their next APUs.
The blame for this disaster (because for AMD, missing out on such millions is a disaster) falls squarely on GF's shoulders (again). It's sad when a company you've spun off is still able to damage your pocket, especially a big account like Apple (I don't like their business, but they have enough people willing to buy the shiny things).
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2013 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms