OnStar Reverses Privacy Changes After Public Outcry

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,390
Points 1,192,475
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Wed, Sep 28 2011 3:01 PM
GM's subsidiary OnStar has reneged on highly controversial privacy changes it announced last week after enormous resistance and threats of a congressional investigation. On September 21, OnStar announced several changes to its terms of service.

The company stated it would now track the position, speed, diagnostic error codes, seatbelt usage data, and crash information of all vehicles, even if drivers didn't have an active subscription. The company also reserved the right to sell the GPS data it gathered, though it claimed no personal information would be attached.

Adam Denison, a GM spokesperson, justified the change by claiming it made it easier for cusomers to re-enroll in the service and gave GM a way to contact people in the event of a recall or consumer hazard. Phone numbers, mailing addresses, and email information evidently weren't good enough. GM customers could opt out of the tracking, but had to specifically choose to do so.


Batman would not approve.

The announcement sparked a wave of protests, multiple letters to the company from Congressmen, and calls for an investigation into whether or not the service's new terms were a violation of one's right to privacy. GM has since backed down. OnStar President Linda Marshall stated: "We realize that our proposed amendments did not satisfy our subscribers. This is why we are leaving the decision in our customers' hands. We listened, we responded and we hope to maintain the trust of our more than 6 million customers."

Marshall's characterization of the amendments as "proposed" is a disingenuous attempt to cast the company's initial decision as some form of debate. OnStar didn't send out a letter asking its customers what they thought of something, it notified them it would begin selling their information in a manner the majority found unacceptable. Meyer claimed that the privacy terms would've helped GM plan future services, but again, this isn't a company that lacked for methods to get in touch with its customers.

Senators who'd previously decried the company's decision praised the reversal. "OnStar did the right thing today, and I'm glad that so many consumers now won't have to worry about their location information being shared without their consent," said Senator Al Franken. "While I'm pleased that OnStar reversed its policy, I still have questions about how that company and others are treating consumers' location information."

Franken has backed the Location Privacy Protection Act, which would require companies to obtain permission from their customers before collecting or sharing GPS data. "Consumers have a right to know what data is being collected about them and have a right to decide whether they want to share that information and when," the senator said.
  • | Post Points: 50
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,104
Points 11,180
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
CDeeter replied on Wed, Sep 28 2011 4:58 PM

"Consumers have a right to know what data is being collected about them and have a right to decide whether they want to share that information and when," the senator said.

About time we heard some common sense from someone in Washington.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 509
Points 3,965
Joined: Oct 2010
Location: HOLLAND!!!!
jonation replied on Wed, Sep 28 2011 10:07 PM

its also about time a company reverses a damn data mining/privacy invasion policy.

CPU: e6400 @ 3.2 (H-50'd)
MB: MSI p6n
RAM: 4G adata
GPU: GTS-450 and 8800GTS for Physx
HDD: WD 500G Black
PSU: 620W Corsair  Mod.
Case: 900-2 with 7 cathodes and AP-15s
OS: W7 and Ubuntu

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,236
Points 37,910
Joined: Mar 2010
AKwyn replied on Thu, Sep 29 2011 1:40 PM

CDeeter:
About time we heard some common sense from someone in Washington.

I agree. I really hope that law passes; I mean we've seen too many cases where the companies just gather information without permission. Sure we can do all these things to block them but it's dam well time they made it official.

 

"The future starts with you; now start posting more!"

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,691
Points 104,390
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Thu, Sep 29 2011 3:22 PM

I like a lot of the things that Sen. Al Franken has done after his election was hijacked for so long. He is good at what he does.

This OnStar debacle was caused by GM's greed. They saw an opportunity to make some fast cash and tried to cram it down customer's throats,......and now ~they're~ the ones having to swallow.

Serves them right,....

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS