Apple May Delay iPad 3 Thanks To A General Lack of Competition

rated by 0 users
This post has 8 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,343
Points 1,191,190
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Mon, Sep 19 2011 6:00 PM
Apple's iPad 3 is currently expected to drop early in 2012, but some analysts are suggesting that the launch window could slip, mostly due to the fact that no one has managed to even dent the iPad 2's market share. The speed of the tablet's success is unprecedented. The iPod, which debuted in 2002, didn't break 20 million units per year (or achieve market dominance) until 2005.


The iPad isn't even 18 months old, and Apple is currently shipping more than nine million per quarter with an estimated 68 percent market share.

Thus far, Apple's would-be competitors have distinguished themselves only by their levels of incompetence. Motorola shoved the Xoom out the door with a buggy OS, a ludicrous $799 price point, and without key advertised features like a functional microSD slot, Adobe Flash, or 4G support (this last has yet to occur, eight months after the tablet went on sale).  The BlackBerry PlayBook has the dubious distinction of making the Xoom look good--RIM announced last week that it managed to sell just 200,000 tablets in Q2, well below Motorola's 440,000 sales during the same period.  

HP's decision to kill the TouchPad and subsequent $99 fire sale makes it an imprecise point of comparison, while sales of Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 have undoubtedly been attenuated by the shipping injunctions and legal fire Apple has poured into the company. Not every tablet has been a flop, but much of the success has come from smaller players (think Toshiba or Asus) with more modest sales targets and fewer delusions of adequacy.


The next-generation A6 will reportedly use 3D chip-stacking technology developed at IBM, with through-silicon-vias used to connect components vertically rather than horizontally.

From Apple's perspective, there's precious little reason to push the iPad 3 to market and possibly good reason to wait. It's unclear if the iPad 3 is going to ship with Apple's A6 processor or not, but delaying the device would give Apple more time to improve CPU yields and lower its manufacturing costs. The A6 is reportedly being built on TSMC's new 28nm process and incorporates the company's 3D chip-stacking technology. The use of through-silicon-vias (TSVs) and chip stacking could significantly improve the A6's power consumption compared to conventional planar silicon, but it adds a layer of complexity that could benefit from additional ramp time.

Absent any current competitor or upcoming must-have product, Apple may opt to wait simply to see what its rivals think of next. Many of the manufacturers and developers working on tablet designs are heavy hitters in their own right. This is one reason Apple has simultaneously backed lawsuits against Android, but Apple's strategy is much more complex than a simple legal assault on ts closest competitors.

There are a number of major technologies scheduled to hit the market in the next 6-9 months, including the first 28nm ARM processors, Intel's Medfield x86 tablet platform, Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich), and Nvidia's Kal-El refresh. Holding back for a few extra months would give Apple a chance to see how the competition adopts these platforms and technologies, and plan for how best to counter them.
  • | Post Points: 110
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 385
Points 3,845
Joined: Jun 2011
RTietjens replied on Mon, Sep 19 2011 7:08 PM

And yet Apple is frantically attempting to restrain trade and stifle competition from Samsung.

Someone's either stupid, or lying to protect their stock portfolio.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,838
Points 45,830
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Mon, Sep 19 2011 7:55 PM

I agree there R T this makes little to no sense as one of the main reason's for the low amount of competition if not the main one is Apple them selves and there legal teams.

OS:Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
MB:ASUS Z87C
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4770 ***
GPU:Geforce GTX 770 4GB
Mem:***ingston 16384MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,683
Points 104,320
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Mon, Sep 19 2011 9:05 PM

I don't like their screwing with their competition either. I say let the market sort it out and let each device stand or fall on it's own merits. We need to overhaul Patent laws in the USA,.....and Apple needs to chill with the lawsuits.

I just can't believe that Apple is so insecure that they think that their products wouldn't stand up to a little competition. Maybe they're afraid that they'll have to lower prices if the other guys products are good. Either way, using your high paid lawyers to stifle competition is a Chicken-Sh*t way to do business.

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,865
Points 29,645
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: United States, Connecticut
omegadraco replied on Mon, Sep 19 2011 10:20 PM

realneil:

I don't like their screwing with their competition either. I say let the market sort it out and let each device stand or fall on it's own merits. We need to overhaul Patent laws in the USA,.....and Apple needs to chill with the lawsuits.

I just can't believe that Apple is so insecure that they think that their products wouldn't stand up to a little competition. Maybe they're afraid that they'll have to lower prices if the other guys products are good. Either way, using your high paid lawyers to stifle competition is a Chicken-Sh*t way to do business.

I could not have said this better myself. The iPad is a pretty good device and I am sure it would stand up to other slates.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 220
Points 2,745
Joined: Apr 2011
gazd1 replied on Tue, Sep 20 2011 9:18 AM

Either way, it doen't worry me at all.Cool I don't buy any more laptops,tablets,etc no more.Smile It ain't the best for my or your eyes anyway.Wink Anyway competition is always good, but I guess Apple does not want to leave it for too long or else they may lose sales, but how much sales will they lose.Smile

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 754
Points 8,520
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Phoenix
LBowen replied on Tue, Sep 20 2011 10:44 AM

Tablets are neat little devices but I have no reason to get one other than the fact I would like one. I will continue to wait on these and hope prices continues to go down.

"I have the power!!"

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 33
Points 270
Joined: Jul 2011
OmniDeus replied on Tue, Sep 20 2011 10:31 PM

forget tablets, they're wasted resources on the masses that consume them like a crazed crack addicted whore. Slates will be the future; multi-core, upgradable ram, ssd, extended battery times, and the ability to run desktop applications on it at full speed. Tablets are just toys for the weak that have to get their tech fix today, that can't wait for tomorrow.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5
Joined: Feb 2012
CSciacca replied on Wed, Feb 15 2012 8:34 AM

FYI: The caption used under the photo is inaccurate to say the least. The photo, which is from IBM, is a 3D rendering of a 3D chip stack with interlayer cooling, but this has nothing to do with Apple's A6. For more information visit http://www.zurich.ibm.com/news/11/cebit.html

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (9 items) | RSS