Retributive Strike: Samsung May Seek Preemptive Ban Against iPhone 5 in Korea

rated by 0 users
This post has 6 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 25,671
Points 1,155,435
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Mon, Sep 19 2011 2:53 PM
Samsung and Apple have been fighting legal battles in Asia, Europe and the US, with the majority of victories thus far going to Apple. Samsung has decided to retaliate on its own turf and is planning to ask Korean courts to ban the iPhone 5 as soon as the device is launched. At present, the two companies are engaged in 23 separate legal battles across much of the developed world and more cases are expected. At this point, the two companies are very nearly engaged in a corporate version of world war.

"Just after the arrival of the iPhone 5 here, Samsung plans to take Apple to court here for its violation of Samsung’s wireless technology related patents," said a senior executive from Samsung Electronics, asking not to be identified.

"For as long as Apple does not drop mobile telecommunications functions, it would be impossible for it to sell its i-branded products without using our patents. We will stick to a strong stance against Apple during the lingering legal fights."



This is a major strategy shift for Samsung, which has mostly avoided a public scrap with Apple. The company has also filed a fresh countersuit against Apple in Australia, appealed the German ban on Galaxy Tab sales in the EU, and is apparently stepping up both its rhetoric and legal offense.

Logistically, the move makes sense. Samsung may have remained silent in the beginning, in hopes of eventually salvaging its relationship with Apple, but the rift between the two companies has apparently passed the point of no return. Rumors suggest that Apple has tapped TSMC for production of its A6 instead of continuing its relationship with Samsung, and that's not a move that can be taken back. While it's technically possible to port a design from one foundry to another, Samsung and TSMC use two different 28nm construction techniques (gate-first and gate-last, respectively).  There's no way to shift between the two, and no chance of Apple switching back to Samsung at 28nm if it's actually committed to TSMC.

Apple's legal pressure forced Samsung to pull its Galaxy Tab 7.7 from display at IFA this year, despite that device's far smaller screen and the lack of an Apple comparison product. "We are taking different tactics since we are quite confident,’’ said another Samsung executive on the condition of anonymity because he wasn’t allowed to speak publicly for Samsung.

"If Samsung wins in Germany that will give us a big breakthrough and so will other envisioned efforts against such products as the iPhone 5."

Despite the current rifts, Apple remains Samsung's largest customer, a fact that undoubtedly complicates the legal dealings between the two. Despite Samsung's bullish commentary, a Korean injunction or finding of infringement is by no means certain to impact other cases. The various nations involved all have different patent laws and varying definitions of what constitutes infringement. Samsung's decision to countersue in Australia come after the company had previously announced it intended to redesign the Galaxy 10.1 to avoid any infringement claims Apple might bring, and are a sign of just how frustrated the electronics giant is with what it views as predatory harassment.
  • | Post Points: 95
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,814
Points 45,635
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Mon, Sep 19 2011 2:56 PM

Hmmm didn't the Galaxy SII sell like 3 million units in Korea like the first day it was available 6 months ago or so? I mean really if there are more than 3 million of a single model Android smart phone in a land area as small as Korea, and there from one OEM this preemptive ban is already done right.

OS:Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
MB:ASUS Z87C
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4770 ***
GPU:Geforce GTX 770 4GB
Mem:***ingston 16384MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,761
Points 40,455
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: New York
Inspector replied on Mon, Sep 19 2011 3:24 PM

ha, samsung strikes back! :D Not all the patents are with apple :P lol

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,865
Points 29,630
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: United States, Connecticut

I agree ha Samsung should strike back. Apple can use a taste of their own medicine when it comes to these legal battles and the madness needs to stop.

Imagine if these companies simply donated all the money they would spend on their legal expenses to charity or even R & D what they would have.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,461
Points 46,925
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Metropolis
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
Super Dave replied on Mon, Sep 19 2011 11:30 PM

 SPAM-posters beware! ®

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,370
Points 30,935
Joined: Nov 2010
Location: Crystal Lake,IL
rrplay replied on Tue, Sep 20 2011 1:15 AM

Good one Super Dave ! not to sure they have actually hire NASA ,,there's a decommissioned satellite headed back down pretty soon.Even NASA is not sure where the Cosmik Debris may land.I suppose one can be optimistic and hope for the best Smile

"Don't Panic ! 'cause HH got's your back!"

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 220
Points 2,745
Joined: Apr 2011
gazd1 replied on Tue, Sep 20 2011 9:04 AM

Well I'll tell you one thing & that is that they better get in fast or Apple will out do them again.Idea Anyway, I wonder how much goes to legal fees & how much that will take off their profits. Maybe they're not worrying about their profits at all, but just want to stuff up the other side.Wink

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | RSS