Battlefield 3 Producer Shares Details On Next-Gen Game's DX11 Support

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,420
Points 1,193,075
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Mon, Aug 29 2011 10:09 PM
Battlefield 3 has become something of a hot item in recent months thanks to the game's incredible visuals and gameplay videos that have left long-time fans of the series salivating. BF3 is the sequel to Battlefield 2 (released back in 2005), and while it's designed for XBox 360, PS3, and PC, the game was built around the PC platform, somewhat of a rarity in the modern age of console-dominated sales.



In this video, GeForce.com's Kris Rey sits down to have a chat with DICE producer Patrick Liu. The Frostbite 2 engine that BF3 uses was designed for the title and, according to Liu, includes a number of improvements.

"“We added a ton of stuff – we basically rewrote the rendering engine from scratch to add real-time radiosity on the PC," said Liu. "It produces amazing indoor lighting… for the scale of the maps we implemented new streaming technology, so we make bigger maps than we have ever been able to before.”

There's a deeply ironic moment at ~1:40 in the video: when asked to list some of the engine's DX11 features, Liu refers to tessellation "doing great on NVIDIA cards," at which point Kris Rey notes "We do love tessellation."

HH loves tessellation too, which is why it's so frustrating that statements like this jump out like big red flags. After the incredibly dubious uses of tessellation in HAWX 2 and Crysis 2, the first question upon hearing a game supports DX11 isn't "does it make the game look better," but "are the DX11 features implemented in a way that enhances in-game visuals without unfairly tilting the competitive landscape towards Nvidia?"


BF3's gameplay as demonstrated in multiple vehicles and on foot. The new Frostbite 2 engine looks great

Hopefully the answer is "yes." BF3 looks like a great game and many would prefer not to see it weighed down with such controversies. No word on minimum specs yet, save for the utterly unhelpful news that it should run just fine on dual GTX 580s. Robust DX9 support should keep the game playable, even on relatively modest GPUs.
  • | Post Points: 65
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,236
Points 37,910
Joined: Mar 2010
AKwyn replied on Mon, Aug 29 2011 10:47 PM

The tessellation comment worries me. Other then that, I'm still looking forward to this game; the number of articles being released just makes me want it even more.

 

"The future starts with you; now start posting more!"

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,795
Points 40,670
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: New York
Inspector replied on Mon, Aug 29 2011 11:07 PM

NICE, now im waiting for beta! :D

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 467
Points 3,710
Joined: Feb 2011

My most anticipated game of the year. I will be purchasing this for the PC.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5
Joined: Sep 2011

Just another crappy console port.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,695
Points 104,425
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator

TaylorKarras:
The tessellation comment worries me.

It should,...tipping the scales towards one card manufacturer's product is total BS. If I hear that it's happening, I'll forgo this game.

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS