Windows 8 Will Support USB 3.0 & Older USB Iterations, Too

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,737
Points 1,209,570
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Wed, Aug 24 2011 3:17 PM
Here's even more on the upcoming Windows 8 OS. In a post on the official Building Windows 8 blog, Dennis Flanagan (Director of Program Management for the Devices and Networking group) assured one and all that Windows 8 will not only support USB 3.0 but will offer backwards compatibility with earlier iterations of the USB standard.

The reasons for including USB 3.0 support are obvious, and it seems like backwards compatibility should be rather simple. Apparently, however, it’s not exactly a cakewalk. From the blog post:

There are also billions of older USB devices that Windows must remain compatible with. How do you write a single piece of software to enable the latest technology on evolving hardware, while making sure it still works with 10 billion existing devices in homes and offices across the world?

Sure, that’s a good point. He also brought up an issue that arose many a year ago, back in 2000 when the USB 2.0 was rolling out. The new host controller was not compatible with older USB devices, which created a mess that wasn’t cleaned up until Microsoft released Windows XP SP1 and added a software fix.


This time around, Microsoft won’t be tempted to design all-new software; instead, it will update its older USB software and add to the stack, thus enabling the new technology while ensuring support for older versions of the USB standard.
  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,054
Points 60,735
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Wed, Aug 24 2011 7:01 PM

Linux will have USB 3.0 support directly in the kernel too... starting Sept. 9th, 2009.

I can hardly believe that Windows still doesn't have this as a base feature without need for mfg drivers.  Do they have 802.11s yet?

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,865
Points 29,645
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: United States, Connecticut

Umm... It better support the newest standard natively while supporting older devices. The one of the major points of these standards is backwards compatibility.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 843
Points 9,155
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: San Diego

I was just thinking that. I thought I was missing something because I just expected it to support those.

Now you're just mashing it!

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,767
Points 105,080
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Mon, Sep 26 2011 11:26 AM

Question:

News:
How do you write a single piece of software to enable the latest technology on evolving hardware, while making sure it still works with 10 billion existing devices in homes and offices across the world?

Answer: Standards. Cleave to them, go by them, and they will follow,.....grasshopper.

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS