so much has changed since Windows 95—the last time Windows was significantly overhauled—when the "desktop" metaphor was established. Today more than two out of three PCs are mobile (laptops, netbooks, notebooks, tablets, slates, convertibles, etc.). Nearly every PC is capable of wireless connectivity. Screen sizes range from under 10" to wall-sized screens and multiple HD screens. Storage has jumped from megabytes to terabytes and has moved up to the cloud. The appearance of touch-screen mobile phones with the rich capabilities they bring, have together changed the way we all view computing. Most of all, computing is much more focused on applications and on people than on the operating system itself or the data. These changes in the landscape motivate the most significant changes to Windows, from the chips to the experience.
Ya right, more tailored for us people in general, ya try again. It looks like a phone OS design with arm in mined, this is garbage.
I'm with you. I like Windows 7 quite a lot, outside of having to restart with most updates. I have never been interested in mobile stuff, specifically, smart phones and tablets. I don't want a dumbed down experience as the "A" company is right apparently in thinking most people want these days.
I guess the real question is, is this really a "dumbed down" experience that is essentially a port from handsets? Or is it really about ease of navigation and access but complete control if we want it or when requested? Not sure we have enough insight yet to determine this.
Editor In Chiefhttp://hothardware.com
I'm leaning towards and hoping your second idea is the direction they take. More of a complete new GUI than just another re-skin while maintaining functionality.
I do agree though that I love Windows 7, and have no plans to change until I'm forced to. I just don't see the need for a new OS every couple of years.
Those statement's are very true Dave. Not that I know exactly what this one will include all together, I am thinking it will be more like a mixture of first an upgrade, second a mixture with server/home server, and third tablet/phone not dumbed down on any device, but adaptive to whatever it is running on and that hardware's capabilities and it's environment. I really hope they are not rushing it to fast and then it turns out like the initial release of Vista with problems in a lot of area's/ ALthough I guess with 7 being solid it won't matter much, I just don't know if Windows 8 is going to be like a Windows ME/Vista release that bob's out of the gate, then when we get Windows XP/7/9 it will be great.
I am concerned for the business environment where many of the features need to be controlled. I do remember seeing a screenshot at some point that shows a portion of the OS that looked like Windows 7. The other items I am concerned about is that it is being designed for a touch interface and most people are not going to have screens on their laptops or desktop computers with touch capability.
while it would be nice to have a new UI, the past UI change (vista) was hated by most because it was different. The problem with a UI change is people don't want to learn a new interface. Nothing better then having someone tell you how the UI is better in Win7 then it was in Vista... AHAHAHAH
"Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window."
Z77 GIGABYTE G1.SNIPER
G.Skill Ripjaws X 16gb PC2133
Asus Blu-ray burner
Seasonic X650 PSU
Patriot Pyro 128gb SSD
It's going to be Windows 7.1 with a godawful phone interface that is impractical for daily use (people will disable this except on their kids machines). There will probably also shortly be a new number thrown after the words "DirectX" that they'll then say won't be backported to Win7 - to scare the gamers into updating.
The main new feature in 8 is going to be an app store full of overpriced programs bloated with DRM. It'll look something like http://i.imgur.com/ZvsZ0.jpg, without the tens of thousands of free apps. That plus FUD about LibreOffice and patent litigation should keep their customer base locked into that easily for the next six or seven years.
What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?
"It's going to be Windows 7.1 with a godawful phone interface..."
Nope. MS has said (and now demonstrated) that the classic UI is fully available *and* that the new UI is completely keyboard/mouse accessible.
"There will probably be a new number thrown after the words "DirectX"....
"they'll then say won't be backported to Win7 - to scare gamers into updating."
You *couldn't* port D3D10 to XP due to fundamental changes in the device driver model and the replacement of GDI by DWM. DX10's visual features may not have been worth the performance hit relative to DX9, but that wasn't Microsoft's fault (and it didn't make DX10 some sort of sham). DX11 is clearly capable of delivering superior visuals to DX9 and can actually improve DX9-level performance in some cases. Trying to claim that DirectX's visual advances are some sort of sham or falsely tied to OS advances is...well, too be blunt, I expect better arguments from you. :P
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2013 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms