Verizon Hops On Bandwagon, Moves to Block Unauthorized Tethering

rated by 0 users
This post has 3 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,492
Points 1,196,595
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Tue, Aug 9 2011 8:35 PM
Last Friday, AT&T gave notice that it would henceforth take steps to block unauthorized tethering. For those who aren't familiar with the term, "tethering" is the practice of using a cell phone's data link to provide wireless service to a desktop or laptop. Now, Verizon is evidently following suit. Customers who have previously had no trouble using tethering on jailbroken devices are reportedly being redirected to Verizon's advertising page for tethered data plans.

AT&T and Verizon have both justified their moves by noting that they don't prevent customers from tethering--they simply charge for the privilege. Verizon, however, has come under particular scrutiny thanks to a clause in the agreement the company signed when it licensed the 700 MHz C Block it uses to run its LTE network. The media advocacy organization Free Press has challenged Verizon's previous attempts to compel the Android Market to remove tethering apps on the grounds that such pressure was an effort to "deny, limit, or restrict” the ability of their customers to use the applications or devices of the customers’ choosing.

The conceptual 'tether' exists between the phone and PC

Verizon's response states that because it offers tethering as a plan option, it's allowed to block customer attempts to circumvent its lockout. The spectrum rules that govern Verizon's use of the C block permit "nondiscriminatory tiered or usage-based pricing plans that require customers with greater capabilities or higher usage patterns to pay a higher fee."

The question here is whether the "deny, limit, or restrict" clause trumps Verizon's argument that it's cracking down on end-users who consume a service. Free Press alleges that Verizon's tethering agreement constitutes double-dipping thanks to the company's pricing structure, where it costs $20 to add tethering to an existing mobile data plan. Customers who do so are only allowed to transfer 2GB of data a month, with each GB thereafter costing an additional $20. That's double Verizon's overage price of 10/GB for standard data plans. The additional costs reportedly stack; an end-user who has exceeded the 4GB data plan attached to his mobile phone and the 2GB tethering plan is charged a total of $30 for their next gigabyte.

The problem with Verizon's argument is that it's charging tethered customers more per GB than untethered customers once the data plan's limit is reached. The fact that tethered devices tend to use more bandwidth than untethered devices doesn't explain why a tethered GB is twice the already outrageous cost of an untethered GB. Verizon would have an easier time justifying a base charge for tethering if it still offered unlimited data plans but there's no good reason for the company to be double-charging customers for data use. The FCC is going to examine the issue, but there's no word on when that's going to happen.
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,865
Points 29,645
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: United States, Connecticut

Ahhh, why do we allow companies to do things like this. As it is consumers are paying a ridiculous amount of money for data on cell services they should be able to use that data plan how they see fit.

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5
Joined: Aug 2011
PAbouAly replied on Tue, Aug 16 2011 12:28 PM

I agree 100%. All corporations are influenced by their competition. Corporations are not happy if their competition are going to other countries for workers, saving money in off-shore banks, and now reviewing usage and blocking unlimited services if their competition has done so. All are competition driven decision, never customer loyalty decisions. Unfortunately the FCC has let AT&T make the quantum leap into this marketing strategy and this will eventually drive all markets to do likewise. Now see what has happened, give AT&T an inch and they want a mile. AT&T started out a service provider and has killed any corporation after merging with them contributing to loss of jobs for example Western Electric a well established electronics, transformer and switching manufacturer. When elephants fight, the grass suffers. We are sick and tired of this! The FCC is just a rubber stamp organization. I will re-assess my choices if Verizon does this.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 3
Points 45
Joined: Aug 2011
MaXGTS911 replied on Thu, Aug 18 2011 12:31 PM

Perfect timing. My current Verizon contract expires next month. Time to jump ship to Sprint.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS