Britain To Legalize Burning Private Copies of Music, Video

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,190
Points 1,186,155
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Wed, Aug 3 2011 8:45 PM
Britain's business secretary, Vince Cable, announced today that the government plans to pass legislation allowing citizens to make legal copies of CDs and DVDs they own. The new law will also allow UK citizens to engage in "form shifting;" the term refers to the right to burn legally downloaded materials to physical media.

(This last right isn't something US citizens enjoy. states: "You are not permitted under section 117 to make a backup copy of other material on a computer's hard drive, such as other copyrighted works that have been downloaded (e.g., music, films)."

"This brings the law into line with, frankly, common sense," said Secretary Cable. "A lot of this has to do with consumer freedom. We need to have a legal framework that supports consumer use rather than treat it as regrettable. We can't say that businesses should embrace technology but say to consumers they can't use technology for products they have paid for."

Vince Cable, looking awesomely grumpy

Cable made this announcement amidst news that the government was dropping its bid to block access to file-sharing websites on the grounds that doing so was cumbersome and technologically unworkable. Ironically, even as the government official plans to make private copying using decade-old technology legal, questions regarding the nature of cloud streaming and the rights of those who subscribe to such services are rising towards the spotlight.

As for the United States, consumers have an explicit right to back up computer software and courts have generally held that individuals may copy music or movies for use in a digital player or for playback via hard drive. The question of user rights as they pertain to downloaded material is murkier; cloud streaming has scarcely been addressed at all. The US's copyright laws might be slightly more modern than the UK's equivalent structures across the pond, but the majority of proposed changes to copyright law since the DMCA was passed in 1998 have overwhelmingly favored rights holders while restricting the concept of fair use.
  • | Post Points: 50
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,382
Points 31,045
Joined: Nov 2010
Location: Crystal Lake,IL
rrplay replied on Thu, Aug 4 2011 12:01 AM

Going to be interesting to see how this pans out ..meanwhile Vince Cable grumpy facial expression sure reminds me of Jeff Dunham's character 'Walter'.

"Don't Panic ! 'cause HH got's your back!"

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,016
Points 10,925
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Mcallen, Texas
OSunday replied on Thu, Aug 4 2011 1:59 AM

For the first time since the turn of the revolution, America can finally start taking pointers the the U.K. again

(no offense meant to the british)

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,865
Points 29,645
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: United States, Connecticut

This only makes sense. This is why I prefer physical media over digital downloads... they can't take that away from me :) The U.S. could certainly add this to their fair use laws along with some rights related to cloud services.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,652
Points 104,120
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia

meanwhile Vince Cable grumpy facial expression sure reminds me of Jeff Dunham's character 'Walter'

Walter,....Yeah, I agree. Smile

I prefer having a hard copy of all of my Media, that's why I don't download movies or music. It's pretty easy to head on out the flea markets and swap meets and buy DVD movies and music Cd's for next to nothing. Sometimes,...rarely, I buy a movie brand new.

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS