Gov't Tests Confirm LightSquared Interference with GPS

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,388
Points 1,192,435
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Sun, Jun 12 2011 7:19 PM
Government tests appear to confirm earlier tests done by the GPS industry: LightSquared's proposed mobile broadband network disrupts GPS devices in the area. The data is given more weight by the impartiality of the testing, but wasn't a surprise: LightSquared's spectrum block is right next to that used by GPS receivers.

All GPS devices tested were affected, but some more than others. The government's tests were overseen by the National PNT Engineering Forum, a federal advisory group of engineers. Some devices simply saw signal strength degrade. Others were completely disabled. For example, the tests found that GM's OnStar system saw a "significant degradation of service" on most receivers tested.

A separate FAA-commissioned study found that "GPS operations below 2000 feet [of elevation] would be unavailable over a large radius of metro (areas)" for aircraft. Meanwhile, James Kirkland, vice president and general counsel of GPS maker Trimble Navigation said, "It will cause interference. It will cause devastating interference. There is not a solution here. In our view it's time to stop squandering resources on this and find alternative spectrum for them."

An alternative spectrum block would move LightSquared's operations away from that of GPS receives, eliminating the interference. The FCC gave LightSquared preliminary approval for the network in January pending interference tests.

The tests also suggested that professional, more precise GPS devices used by corporate and government users would be more likely to affected by LightSquared interference than cheaper consumer units.

Possible solutions include the aforementioned move of LightSquared's service to a different spectrum block. Or, the spectrum block could be reduced in size. Another possibility, though a daunting one, would be to install filters on GPS receivers to limit LightSquared interference.

A joint industry report from LightSquared and the GPS industry is due on June 15th; there will then be a public comment period before the FCC makes its final decision.
  • | Post Points: 50
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,865
Points 29,645
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: United States, Connecticut

I like the idea of the independent 4G network that LightSquared is looking to build. Let's hope they figure out their issues. Installing filters on existing GPS devices is pretty much not an option their are far too many of them.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,104
Points 11,180
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
CDeeter replied on Sun, Jun 12 2011 11:21 PM

Totally agree, changing the spectrum sounds like the way to go. But then again, where do you shift it to that it won't interfere with the next band over? Or is this interference just related to how gps and 4g interact with each other?

Hmm, time will tell I suppose.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 207
Points 1,515
Joined: Feb 2011
pwrntspd replied on Mon, Jun 13 2011 9:03 PM

This seems to be a growing problem in all communications nowadays. Whats going to happen when we run out of frequency bands to work with?

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS