Microsoft's Acquisition Deal with Nvidia is Nothing New

rated by 0 users
This post has 10 Replies | 5 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,339
Points 1,191,155
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Mon, Jun 6 2011 9:27 AM

Information Week on late Friday afternoon posted about a deal between Microsoft and Nvidia that would give the Redmond software maker first dibs on acquiring Nvidia if a third party offers to buy the graphics chip maker for 30 percent or more of its outstanding shares. The deal, which Information Week quoted in a recent SEC filing dated May 27th, gives Microsoft the exclusive right to match such offers, and/or essentially veto attempts by its rivals to acquire Nvidia. That's an interesting position for Microsoft to be in, though hardly a new one.

Missing from Information Week's quote of the "Risk Factors" section of Nvidia's most recent 10K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is the date in which this agreement was first made. Here's the expanded quote:

"On March 5, 2000, we entered into an agreement with Microsoft in which we agreed to develop and sell graphics chips and to license certain technology to Microsoft and its licensees for use in the Xbox. Under the agreement, if an individual or corporation makes an offer to purchase shares equal to or greater than 30 percent of the outstanding shares of our common stock, Microsoft may have first and last rights of refusal to purchase the stock. The Microsoft provision and the other factors listed above could also delay or prevent a change in control of Nvidia."

Figuring the date must be a typo (being an "exclusive" discovery and all), All Things D got in touch with Nvidia, who said that the arrangement with Microsoft is not a new one and has been disclosed in every quarterly filing since the deal was struck. All Things D confirmed as much when it dug through filings from prior years, going all the way back to 2000.

"So for whatever reason Information Week has decided to call attention to an 11-year old arrangement... Having been disclosed something like 55 times (five times a year give or take over 11 years), it's obviously not news to anyone who routinely does read them, such as analysts, investors, and pretty much anyone who pays reasonably close attention to Nvidia," All Things D said.

As Information Week itself points out, "the obscure pact is more than a decade old, but is apparently still in effect," that latter point being the reason they're calling attention to an agreement first formed more than a decade ago. The circumstances surrounding the deal is that back in 2000, Microsoft handed Nvidia "$200 million as an advance against graphics chip purchases and licensing the Company's technology." The cash infusion was to be used to develop a chip for what would become the Xbox. This was back when Nvidia was still a relatively small company with about $375 million in annual sales, and before the infamous takeover of 3dfx. Things are obviously much different now.

And so there you have it -- if you're afraid of what would happen to the graphics market should Microsoft acquire Nvidia, you can exhale knowing there's no impending deal in place. There is, however, an 11-year old agreement that still applies today, and is perhaps more interesting than ever when you consider the current state of the market, and specifically the push into tablet and smartphone graphics, both of which are areas Microsoft wants to play a bigger role. It would also be an expensive proposition for Microsoft, should Nvidia ever be presented with a buyout offer.

  • | Post Points: 95
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,865
Points 29,645
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: United States, Connecticut

Have to love what the press will do when they have no news. Thanks for setting the record straight HH.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 754
Points 8,520
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Phoenix
LBowen replied on Mon, Jun 6 2011 10:19 AM

Wow, I recall hearing about this deal back then. I thought to myself, "I wonder how this will affect the gaming market?" For a moment there I thought NVIDIA was about to be assimilated into Microsoft.

"I have the power!!"

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,795
Points 40,670
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: New York

Well first time i have read of this :). when i read the title i thought Microsoft bought Nvidia... lol

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,236
Points 37,910
Joined: Mar 2010
AKwyn replied on Mon, Jun 6 2011 6:13 PM

I agree with omegadraco. This is news?!?! Thank you HH for clearing things up for us.

 

"The future starts with you; now start posting more!"

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 33
Points 265
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: San Diego

It probably wouldn't be a bad idea to do so.

Nvidia makes a great graphics processor. Microsoft could poteneially put themselves in a very good light if they included Nvidia chipsets in all MS devices. Particularly WP7 phones. But since they aren't making their own devices... It's not likely to happen. (But what about NOKIA?) Hmmm...

Nah...

p.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 88
Points 750
Joined: Apr 2011

Even though this is an old agreement, the idea of Microsoft owning Nvidia still scares me bit-less. :P

I mean, the way Microsoft and Apple tend to monopolize the things they own, that would be a very bad day!

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,809
Points 18,105
Joined: May 2009
Location: Waikiki

It would make more sense if Lucas or Disney bought them out in regards of the effects, animation and games production.

Intel Core i7-875K Quad
Asetek 510LC 120MM
4GB Kingston Hyper-X DDR-3
ASUS P7P55D-E Pro
CyberPower 800 PSU
Kingston 64GB SSD 
2 Hitachi 1-TB HDD'S
FirePro V8800
8X Blu-Ray DVD±R/±RW
HPw2207 22" LCD
Cintiq 21UX
CoolerMaster 690II Advance
Win 7 Pro 64 bit
Special thanks to HotHardware.com!
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,865
Points 29,645
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: United States, Connecticut

I have a feeling that the powers that be would never allow the deal to go through since it would create some kind of monopoly. I also don't think Nvidia is going anywhere with all the pots that they have their hands in.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,865
Points 29,645
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: United States, Connecticut

That would be cool though I would be afraid that they would spend more time optimizing for Nvidia and leave AMD out in the cold to some degree. Personally I prefer Nvidia products but would not want the competition to fail.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,236
Points 37,910
Joined: Mar 2010
AKwyn replied on Tue, Jun 7 2011 10:26 PM

omegadraco:

I have a feeling that the powers that be would never allow the deal to go through since it would create some kind of monopoly. I also don't think Nvidia is going anywhere with all the pots that they have their hands in.

Well I heard a rumor somewhere that Apple wanted to acquire NVIDIA and I'd think that'd work well due to the fact that Apple systems are mainly used in the graphics processing realm and Apple is always on the cutting edge of everything. They've already purchased an ARM facility to make their own processors, what's to stop them from buying NVIDIA and integrating their tech into their systems while still offering their graphics to OEMs?

 

"The future starts with you; now start posting more!"

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (11 items) | RSS