Chip-In-Ball Technology Could Assist In Making Close Calls In NFL

rated by 0 users
This post has 7 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 25,676
Points 1,155,565
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Sun, Aug 8 2010 10:51 AM
If you thought microchips were only good for powering your desktop, netbook and cellphone (and maybe that tracking thing within your pup), you should think again. America's most popular sport (that's football, of course) is considering using microchips to better officiate games, make better calls and avoid mistakes that could prove costly if made at the wrong time. The NFL has been using Instant Reply for some time now in order to really evaluate close calls on the field, but even those aren't perfect. Camera angles can be blocked by players, and things can happen so quickly that even when slowed down, it's hard for the human eye to tell what a call should be.


But if a microchip were inside of a football, a lot of that guesswork would be removed. That's the thinking behind the new proposal, which would use "chip-in-ball technology" in order to "help rule on contentious touchdown and first down calls. Germany's Cairos Technologies is in charge of the chip, which is also being considered for soccer (or global football) for the same reasons.


This chip-in-ball technology would essentially allow the ball to determine whether it crossed the line for a touchdown, whether it actually went 10 yards for a first down, or whether it moved before the snap. There's no question that this would be a hotly debated move; people generally do not like machines making decisions that affect the outcome of humans. There's a certain level of distrust, and of course, everyone knows that even computers can make mistakes. But another level of redundancy in an attempt to get the call right seems like a smart move to us. The NFL has yet to comment on the matter, but it's practically a certainty that this will not be ready in time for this year's season.
  • | Post Points: 80
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 447
Points 5,270
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Cincinnati

I really wanted something like this for the world cup. There were so many blown calls by refs, especially the one with Germany vs. England where that one goal was about a meter in but the ref didn't allow it.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,809
Points 18,105
Joined: May 2009
Location: Waikiki

Didnt they have something like this on the Jetsons:P

Next thing we will have is RoboBall :)

Good idea either way. They have acurate race chips in F1 cars and it has made a huge difference in calculating the exact times and made it more fun by allowing the cameras to track the cars exactly!

Intel Core i7-875K Quad
Asetek 510LC 120MM
4GB Kingston Hyper-X DDR-3
ASUS P7P55D-E Pro
CyberPower 800 PSU
Kingston 64GB SSD 
2 Hitachi 1-TB HDD'S
FirePro V8800
8X Blu-Ray DVD±R/±RW
HPw2207 22" LCD
Cintiq 21UX
CoolerMaster 690II Advance
Win 7 Pro 64 bit
Special thanks to HotHardware.com!
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,461
Points 46,925
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Metropolis
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator

News:
But if a microchip were inside of a football, a lot of that guesswork would be removed.

Why not a microphone? Now that would be epic!

 SPAM-posters beware! ®

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,053
Points 60,700
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Mon, Aug 9 2010 6:11 PM

>> everyone knows that even computers can make mistakes.

Coming from a technical site, I'm going to hope that's sarcasm.

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,081
Points 38,055
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
acarzt replied on Tue, Aug 10 2010 1:54 AM

3vi1:

>> everyone knows that even computers can make mistakes.

Coming from a technical site, I'm going to hope that's sarcasm.

In the NHL there have been rare instances where the puck was not detected when it went into the goal, which would normally set off the buzzer and award a point.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,053
Points 60,700
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Wed, Aug 11 2010 9:15 PM

Not a computer mistake - human error in design.

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 12
Points 60
Joined: Jul 2010

That would be a very good idea especially in time of a big championship like the Super Bowl so when the refs have to make hard decision it would make their jobs a lot more easy and would probably make people be less angry on the call because of the chip in the ball.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (8 items) | RSS