We are officially declaring May 11, 2010 "Athlon II" day. Why you ask? Because AMD is launching a total of six new Athlon II processors today, including a new flagship model, targeted squarely at budget conscious consumers. We should point out, however, that all six of the processors launching today feature existing core microarchitectures. While they do differ from previous offerings in terms of frequency, and of course their model names, all of the new Athlon II processors arriving today are based on the same Propus (X4), Regor (X2), and Rana (X3) cores that were introduced a few months back.We got our hands on the new flagship Athlon II X4, the 3.0GHz Athlon II X4 640, and have its performance results posted on the pages ahead...AMD Athlon II X4 640: 4-Cores On The Cheap
The link to your review is broken.
Yea, the link in the comments stub is broken even though the article is up. Try this sylv3rblade
*EDIT*The Futuremark numbers don't seem to jive with the rest of the test. The 640 looks like a moster compared to the 635 in Futuremark but is not much better in all the other test. Since this is just a clock increase without any tweaking of the core something seems off. Any ideas?
Smooth Creations LANShark "Blue Flame" + ASUS G73JH-A2 + ASUS EeePC S101H
"I frag therefore I am!"
This is what AMD always does. Good bang for the buck. Nowadays, even inexpensive PC's can, and do, have cutting edge features combined with acceptable performance. While it's true that they're not breaking any speed records, they're robust enough to game with using a proper Video card.
Even though I personally am not in the market for one, I'm glad to see them here, and at their modest price points as well. AMD helps to keep Intel's prices in check.
Don't part with your illusions. When they are gone you may still exist, but you have ceased to live.
In test system there are two 635's where one should be a 640.
Shame you guys didn't have any of the "Athlon II XXXe" to test out, nice review nonetheless.
It is a real shame HH doesnt do CPU-Z screenshots, then things could be easily explained. Take a good look at the part number. For the Phenom chips, the last two letters, GI meant revision C2, and GM meant revision C3. This new 640 is a new revision. So not only did the 640 get a speed increase in mhz, it got a core revision as well. Maybe these chips are actually disabled "deneb" chips, but Propus has its own die. Any process improvement will eventually trickle down to the mainstream and budget line ups eventually. This is why on the tests that there are more substantial differences in scores with seemingly no explanation why when a 100mhz bump in speed would not be thought of as doing to much to the scores.
A+ Certified PC Repair Technician Associates Degree in Computer ScienceBachelors Degree in Computer Information Systems
DFI Lanparty UT NF3 250GB Dead.......Replacement Abit KV-85Learn more about Comp TIA A+ Certification.
@sylv3rblade - Thanks for the head's up, link was fixed as soon as we saw your post.
@InfinityzeN - I think you were right, and were was an issue with some Vantage scores. I was experimenting with AoD before benchmarking, and although I had reset back to defaults, I have a suspicion the CPU wasn't stock for the Vantage tests. Re-ran the tests and have updated.
@Drago - Added CPU-Z shots to page 1. Would normally do this for a full-blown article, but had a VERY limited time with this CPU and focused solely on performance.
Marco ChiappettaManaging Editor @ HotHardware.com
Follow Marco on Twitter
How does your system work with the card you did buy? Can you work properly now?
Happens sometimes. Granted I won them from here, but still pops your bubble a bit. A week after I got my 2 4870s they came out with the 4890s. Faster and cooler running.
I am really loving these AMD CPUs right now though. A lot of the people in my TF2 community have come to me in the last few months wanting to build new PCs on tight budgets. I was able to get someone a x3 system for under $500 and found a really nice combo on newegg with a Athlon X2 full system for $370. Even though it was integrated graphics. Still miles better than the Pentium 4 system he was using.
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2014 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms