CPU Sales Up 39 Percent In Q1; AMD's Revenue Share Slips Despite New Launches

rated by 0 users
This post has 2 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 24,892
Points 1,117,035
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Fri, Apr 30 2010 3:45 PM
IDC's latest report on CPU revenue and market share for Q1 2010 confirms results we saw when Intel reported its record first quarter earnings. According to the research firm, the CPU market fell just 5.6 percent from Q4 2009 to Q1 2010. Historically, CPU sales fall 8-10 percent over the same period; IDC's figures lend credence to the idea that the IT recession is beginning to break.

"PC processor shipments typically decline around 7 to 8 percent going from fourth quarter to first quarter," said Shane Rau director of Semiconductors: Personal Computing research at IDC. "A decline of 5.6% is modest and wouldn't mean much by itself. However, after the huge rise in shipments we saw in the fourth quarter, it adds more credibility to market recovery and that the PC industry anticipates improvement in PC end demand in 2010."

Broken down by segment, mobile PCs declined the most at 6.3 percent, probably thanks to the precipitous drop in Atom shipments in Q1. Falling volumes were offset by rising ASPs which were up 4.1 percent. That gain, however, is almost entirely on Intel's side; AMD executives confirmed during company's Q1 conference call that its own ASPs had improved due to a better product mixture as opposed to any actual uptick in CPU pricing.

Intel gained market share in all three segments despite AMD's extremely competitive server pricing and new 8-12 core processors. Santa Clara earned 81 percent of the overall unit market share in Q1, a gain of 0.5 percent, while AMD took 18.8 percent (a loss of 0.6 percent). By segment, Intel snatched 87.8 percent of mobile sales (up 0.5 percent) 90.2 percent of server/workstations (up 0.4 percent) and 71.7 percent of desktop sales, up 0.6 percent.


AMD's new six-core desktop processor. Behold Thuban, aka Instanbul, aka Constantinople.

AMD has a chance to reverse these trends in Q2 thanks to the aforementioned server products and the company's impressive six-core processor that popped up just this week. Both launches play to the company's historic strength in servers and desktop technology; we've a feeling it'll still be awhile before we see AMD earning major ground in mobile.

Farther Ahead

Like Intel and AMD themselves, Rau isn't willing to commit to a major corporate refresh cycle in 2010 and chooses to focus on consumer projections instead. He predicts shoppers will want "more value than just low price in their PCs...In terms of the processor, that means more openness to paying for benefits such as good performance and reduced power consumption that serves long battery life."

Good performance is a given; Intel's new ultra-mobile Core processors are scrumptious looking, but improved battery life isn't an obvious sales point for 2010. The last two years have been about netbooks—thin, light, consumer-driven products with "good enough" performance and batteries that could last past 10 hours. From where we sit today, 2011, not 2010, will be the year to watch in terms of significant power reduction.

Intel's 32nm Atom will launch in the latter half of 2011, AMD's own netbook-aimed Bobcat core should be available around the same time, and we might even start to see the first OLED displays on thin-and-light systems.
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,439
Points 102,180
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Sat, May 1 2010 11:14 AM

AMD is game. AMD is necessary in the CPU market too because they help to keep prices lower.

The new 6 core CPU's for 300 bucks are a 'giant slap in the face' for Intel and their "Take No Prisoners" pricing structures.

Yes,....AMD IS Game!

Don't part with your illusions. When they are gone you may still exist, but you have ceased to live.

(Mark Twain)

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 318
Points 3,180
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Louisiana

I am surprised that AMD actually lost some ground as their prices definitely were not the cause of this. I think AMD has to make serious inroads as Intel has established themselves as the go to CPU supplier. AMD must market them selves more. Hopefully with the settlement and the branching off from the fabs they can put more money into this area.

Also if the Apple deal was to go through, which I believe will go through with fusion this will gave AMD a huge exposure but more than that it will show they have arrived and they will gain respect. To me this is what it boils down to AMD has no respect people equate it to a second class CPU company.

My first build had a 900Mhz Thunderbird Athlon in it. AMD will get their day.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS