Way back in November of 2007, AMD unveiled all of the components of the "Spider" platform, which consisted of a Phenom processor, 700-series chipset-based motherboard, and Radeon HD 3800 series graphics. A little over a year later, in January of 2009, AMD completed a refresh of their total platform and dubbed it "Dragon". Similarly, the Dragon platform consisted of an all-AMD processor, chipset, and GPU combo, but this time the Phenom II, a revamped 700-series chipset with a new southbridge, and Radeon HD 4800 series graphics were at the heart of the platform. Do you see a pattern forming, here? If you recalled AMD's platform roll-out plans for the last few years, the new "Leo" platform we'll be showing you in this article may not come as a total surprise. After all, we have already shown you the 890GX chipset, the first in the 800-series. And we've almost lost cound of how many Radeon HD 5000-series graphics cards we've featured on these pages. Today, AMD completes the platform picture with the release of a new series of six-core processors, aptly named the Phenom II X6. We should also point out a new enthusiast-class chipset is arriving alongside the Phenom II X6, the 890FX. We hinted at the Phenom II X6's arrival in our coverage of the AMD 890GX chipset a few weeks back. And if you're familiar with AMD's chipset naming convention, figuring out what makes the 890FX tick shouldn't be too difficult--whereas the 890GX features integrated graphics, the 890FX does not. But there are a few more wrinkles to the story we'll explain on the pages ahead. For now, check out the features and specifications of the new 3.2GHz Phenom II X6 1090T and 2.8GHz 1055T processors arriving today, and then move on for the rest of the scoop... AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 6-Core Processor Review
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Processor
Marco:Our tests showed the
1090T performing in roughly the same neighborhood as the Core i7 870 and
Core i7 975 depending on the application, but the Phenom II X6 1090T
costs hundreds of dollars less than both.
This right here sums everything up pretty well. Might not be the top performer, but most of us not counting Raid don't have that much to spend on a CPU. This looks like one hell of a CPU for the price.
The 1090T is only $309 on the Egg! That's crazy compared to the I7's 1K price tag!
Pair it up with the current slew of Infineye cards and the price is just right. You can even save enough to get yourself the extra three monitors!
This just proves my point that AMD is essential to the home computer consumer. This is true even if you don't buy one of them.
The introduction of a CPU in the 300 dollar range that competes with Intel's 675-1000 dollar CPU's is significant and welcome news indeed.
This introduction HAS to affect prices of Intel CPU's in the near future unless they (Intel) want to see a runaway migration to the 'other side' like has happened in the past.
Intel seems to be able to counter within a short time frame, just about every move by AMD with something better, but they always charge a very healthy premium for their technology. AMD’s sensible pricing structures for their competitive CPU’s deliver what we want as consumers, for prices that we can more easily afford in today’s economy.
It’s true that Intel has low priced offerings for us, but not their performance line of CPU’s.
Thank You for doing it yet again AMD!
And thanks for another great review HotHardware.
Don't part with your illusions. When they are gone you may still exist, but you have ceased to live.
"despite the latter's higher default clock speed (3.3GHz vs."
It should be 3.2Ghz. Thanks for the review!
Considering the price and that AMD won't come out with the next generation of CPU's in a while I see very little reason to wait. However in my case, I just unlocked my 720BE to a quad core (thanks to ASUS) 2 weeks ago so I'm unsure what to do.
If I hadn't recently unlocked my triple core 720BE to a quad core (thanks to ASUS) I would definitely have bought this CPU straight away. Now I will w Great bang for the buck.
Okay, I'm confused. The benchmarks and in-game performance tell two very different stories. So which one is it: does this belong in a gaming rig or not?
@Gibbersome - The low-res gaming tests don't paint a pretty picture, but the 1090T is plenty fast for a gaming rig. With the resolution cranked up and details maxes, you're going to be more GPU bound, than CPU.
Marco ChiappettaManaging Editor @ HotHardware.com
Follow Marco on Twitter
Thanks Marco. At the very least, it fills the niche for consumers looking for a cheap multi-core processor.
I fully agree with realneil on this. While the 980x is still the enthusiast's pick, Intel is going to find it hard to compete with AMD on price.
very impressive for the price!
"Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window."
Z77 GIGABYTE G1.SNIPER
G.Skill Ripjaws X 16gb PC2133
Asus Blu-ray burner
Seasonic X650 PSU
Patriot Pyro 128gb SSD
Another great review, I would agree Marco on a cost to cost basis you cannot match what AMD brings to the table. As you mentioned they are not the performance champion but they do offer a compelling solution to value shoppers or people who still own the good old trusty AM3 setup. What a treat they are getting, a simple bios update and they keep rolling along.
As we move forward AMD will only strengthen their lineup as things move closer to the fusion launch.
It is a great day indeed when you can get 6 cores running near 3GHZ for under $300 and the other for $200.
So basically what I see here is that if you are not willing to fork over 3-45K and up for a great system you should go with one of these new AMD 6 core processors (this represents the largest PC user population worldwide by a margin that is not really even a margin), you should go for one of these new AMD based systems which you will most likely be able to buy 2-4 computers, and for the same price of a single six core Intel system.
One thing we need to realize here is the user for the lower priced system with the best performance all together represents probably 75% of the PC market in both expectations as well as usage parameters.
So AMD basically represents this huge market population, where Intel represents the remaining 20-25% of the market. The biggest thing here as well as the market decider is the only people in general who understand any of this is a percentage of that 25%. Seems a rather sad state of affairs for the rest of the worlds population does it not? While in all reality it also show's that AMD most likely has a lot of growing to do in the near future as the general population figures this out. Much like I will also say the last time AMD started seriously chomping on some Intel market share. I love when a market corrects itself because in the end us small percentage get more to play with as does the rest of the world sooner or later :)
Intel Core i7 920-930 still beats AMD 1090T!
Well I run a 930 my wife runs a 965BE she inherited. When run side by side in our systems both running the same speed DDR3 and one a ATI 5870 with the other a 5850 the difference is pretty much laughable on the same game. So is that worthy of 700 bucks of a difference? Were talking maybe 2 fps if that (and usually not that) so a 6 core processor of the AMD variety is even closer than a 4 core. Sounds like a waste of money to me more than anything!
No complaints so far on my 1090T. Around April I was about to build an i7 system when I heard the 1090T was coming out. Paired with an 890FX board and 8 gigs of ram, system is the fastest i have owned yet (previous systems were athlon and Phenom II 710, so not saying much here). I have never had an Intel processor to compare AMD to...
i7 950 - ASUS Rampage 3 Extreme - ASUS GTX 570 - AZZA Hurricane - 6 GB Corsair 1600 - Corsair AX750 - WD 1tb black Thank You HH!!!!!!
AMD 1090T - MSI 890FXA-GD70 - XFX HD5850 x2 - CM Storm Scout - 8GB Kingston HyperX 1600 - Corsair HX850 - Sammy spinpoint f3
Was just looking through this again and noticed that the test systems used a GeForce GTX 280. Would love to see a a ATI 5800 series card in there to complete the Leo platform
Love amd's 1090t
I think if AMD really tried to make a high end top of the line CPU to compete with Intel, it would be a pretty stout chip.
I miss the days when AMD had the faster CPUs AND at a lower price.
Core i7 920|EVGA X58|GTX 660 TI & 460se for PHYSX|2x30GB Vertex RAID0|5x1.5TB RAID5
-- Certifications --
CompTIA A+; CompTIA Network+ ; CompTIA Security+; Microsoft Certified Professional(MCP); Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator(MCSA); Microsoft Certified Sysems Engineer(MCSE); Certified Wireless Network Administrator (CWNA); Certified Wireless Security Professional (CWSP); Aruba Certified Mobility Associate (ACMA);
I'd actually settle for a clearer technical (read: actual) roadmap of what AMD is trying to do more rather than an actual chip. They have been keeping their plans too close to their chest. I'd love to be enthusiastic about their upcoming product but its hard when I have no idea what they are and what they plan to do! All I know is that power point slide that they have been showing since last year.
I think they're just winging it lol
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2013 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms