So all those new tv (3D) would be useless in afew years as every one switches to the internet? I watch shows on a tv more then on the internet. Mainly because i need afaster internet :D, it gets so annoying when it just stops to load.
I agree completely with you on this Ray. It's not necessarily the cost of channels that drives me away, but it's just the convenience that websites like Hulu grant to me and millions of other people. TV shows have a set date and time, and if you miss it...well good luck waiting to see a re-run. The only time that I can see a re-run of a TV show the next week is anything on Discovery Channel, like Mythbusters
The fact of it is, Hulu gives people the ability to watch their favorite shows (if it's on the site) at their own time and pace. No need for DVR or anything that records a show for you. I know personally that I watch Family Guy, V, House, Chuck, The Cleveland Show, American Dad, The Office, and several movies as well on Hulu. I do it when I'm bored and I feel like watching TV shows that aren't currently on the TV.
I bet this is hurting the ratings of some prime time TV shows as well. I don't care about the sitcoms because their ratings are bad anyway, but like the shows I mentioned above...
However, because 600,000 surveyed people canceled their TV subscription, I bet this is why rumors started flying out that Hulu would soon be charging. I still don't know if that's true, and if it is...then poo.
I don't think it's cool that people have to pay for channels that they don't even watch, that's why I have a HD box from Time Warner Cable, but still the standard channel package. I get 30 free channels of HD, and luckily for me they're my favorite channels to watch: Discovery, AMC, TNT...etc...
Cable boxes have already added on-demand features. It's just a matter of time before the companies sign agreements and put streaming of these sites right in the cable boxes.
I'm actually surprised that there's not been manufacturer-produced tuner apps for the video game consoles yet - but the content services would probably treat that like they did Boxee. :\
What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?
Personally, i've cancelled my cable tv lol I live off of netflix and the internet now.
I can watch all my favorite shows online or I can download them off a torrent. No point in paying and extra $100 a month to watch a few shows. Plus all those movie channels with movies I don't want to see. And then on-demand stuff rarely has anything good.
I love my direct TV. I couldn't live with out it, gotta keep up with F1~!
"Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window."
Z77 GIGABYTE G1.SNIPER
G.Skill Ripjaws X 16gb PC2133
Asus Blu-ray burner
Seasonic X650 PSU
Patriot Pyro 128gb SSD
Never really watched TV online!
I have checked out Hulu and the others, yet it always seemed like the show are delayed from the broadcast episodes. I was beginning to wonder if Hulu was still even around. I get the feeling that all of them will be replaced by the upcoming attack from the Cell phone companies. If they start to provide all the same quality that we get from cable and Internet then paying for one stand alone service make a whole lot more sense!
Like DerMeister said, gotta keep up with my F1. Since the higher digital channels are the only ones to provide SpeedTV. I am just going to have to wait it out. Over the Internet there are places like BBC One that stream the races over the Internet after the original broadcast. But if you are anywhere else other than Briton then you are out of luck, you just get a screen telling you the service is unavailable in your area!
I can almost guarantee that people will start to use their ISP to get their television, and that places like Hulu will be the new online cable TV provider. I just hope that the Cell companies will put that one under the rug.
I am just hoping that Schumacher starts doing better! If not, I hope Massa and Vettle kick the Arrogant Alonso to the back of the pack!
I must say I watch TV on the internet or at least programs youtube and shorts every day. I watch Bill Marr, and a lot of commentary shows on the web almost every day. For some I just watch it on the web, for other such as Jay Leno or David Letterman or even SNL I see a specific thing that interests me and I watch just that short or part of the program. I also check in on things on shows I watch like Survivor which have specific web content. Either way I watch I would say at least an hour of programming daily on the web sometimes (pretty frequently)considerably more.
I can definitely see this as a very valid form of getting my TV as more and more programs are also available on the web. It is just way more convenient to not have to keep a network schedule, but pop to it when I can or want to do so.
I've got Direct TV and I'm fine with it.I rarely ever watch TV online unless I miss a show that didn't record ( or a show I don't get at all on Direct TV )
All i say about hulu is you have to have a very fast internet connection!
LOL hulu is nice, its not blocked at my school xD. When ever i have a sub i just go watch some shows...
So what you are saying is that our taxes go towards students being able to go to school and watch TV on our dime? Why don't we just pay for y'all to go to the movies as well, maybe Disney world!
That would be awesome Animator! Wanna send those money over to my house instead? I would have a great time! :P.
When you have a sub you just sit around anyways so does it matter? The computers are alwasy on and going on there doesn't stop anyone from learning as its a sub and they don't teach, they just watch the students so they don't go crazy...
Substitute \Sub"stit"ute\, n. [L. substitutus, p. p. of substituere to put under, put in the place of; sub under + statuere to put, place: cf. F. substitut. One who, or that which, is substituted or put in the place of another; one who acts for another; that which stands in lieu of something else; specifically (Mil.), a person who enlists for military service in the place of a conscript or drafted man.
In a world where people like to multitask, it doesn't surprise me that people are turning towards the internet to watch TV content. Some are willing to sacrifice HD quality for a cheaper alternative. Soon or later, businesses will find a way to make a profit out of this phenomenon. It is still new now...but as weeks and months pass by, regulations will be enforced that will force people to pay for services online in order to watch their favorite TV shows. However, it can backfire because of a precedent. Businesses must develop a profitable model that will help gain revenue. Otherwise, all will be lost. For example, newspaper companies failed to develop a sustainable model that will help earn them revenue for their businesses. Majority of newspapers can be read online with free of charge. This is why you see a lot of buyouts, and cuts on budgets and jobs. Not too long ago, a Colorado newspaper company shut down after being in business for over 50 years. From a business perspective, I think it's going to be very interesting on how consumers would respond to paying to watch TV online.
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2014 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms