Windows Mobile 6.x Devices Will Not Get Windows Phone 7 Upgrades

rated by 0 users
This post has 2 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 25,892
Points 1,173,855
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Tue, Mar 2 2010 5:13 AM
Microsoft is tightening its control over upcoming Windows Phone 7 devices. As a result, Windows Mobile 6.x devices won't be upgradable to the newer OS. Even devices such as the recently announced HTC HD2 won't qualify for an upgrade.

At first glance, the HD2 meets Microsoft's criteria for a Windows Phone 7 device. It has a 1GHz Qualcomm processor, high-resolution capacitive touch display, 5-megapixel camera, and a 3.5mm headphone jack. The problem is the phone has two too many buttons. You see, Microsoft has mandated that all Windows Phone 7 devices have just three hardware buttons. The HD2 has five.

These two extra buttons will prohibit the HD2 from being considered for Windows Phone 7. As Natasha Kwan, General Manager for Microsoft’s Mobile Communications Business in the Asia-Pacific region put it, the HD2 “doesn’t qualify because it doesn’t have the three buttons.”

Microsoft isn't singling out the HD2 or HTC. Instead, the company is being very strict about the requirements for any Windows Phone 7 device. “Because we have very specific requirements for Windows Phone 7 Series the current phones we have right now will not be upgradable,” Kwan explained.

Because Microsoft hasn't revealed all of the requirements for Windows Phone 7 devices, the HD2 and other high-end phones may be missing other components as well. Tony Wilkinson, Business Operations Director for Microsoft Australia, said, “There are some hardware components that the HD doesn’t have.”

Microsoft is expected to reveal the complete requirements for Windows Phone 7 devices at the MIX developer conference in Las Vegas this month.
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,053
Points 60,700
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
3vi1 replied on Tue, Mar 2 2010 1:36 PM

Stringent yet whimiscal requirements: It sounds like Microsoft's trying to make the platform more predictable across devices, for their own marketplace benefits - forgetting that they really need the support of these hardware manufacturers to get their product out to the world.

If hardware manufacturers aren't allowed to try to build hardware better than their competitors (like adding a feature that may require its own physical button), why the heck should they use Windows Mobile instead of Android, MeeGo, or their own solution?

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?


  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,821
Points 45,700
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Tue, Mar 2 2010 2:46 PM

Great points 3vi1, this seems like very thinly screened desperation on M$'s part.

OS:Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4770 ***
GPU:Geforce GTX 770 4GB
Mem:***ingston 16384MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS