Broken By Design: Ubisoft's New DRM Scheme, Their Worst Misstep Yet

rated by 0 users
This post has 15 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 25,885
Points 1,173,325
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Sun, Feb 21 2010 4:57 PM
Ubisoft is one of the largest video game publishing companies in the world, but when it comes to DRM (Digital Rights Management), the corporate executives at the helm have the collective intelligence of a ham sandwich. In years' past, the publisher was criticized for its use of StarForce copy protection, the PC port of Assassin's Creed tried to phone home every 75 seconds (causing the game to lag and stutter), and an official patch for Rainbow Six Vegas 2 broke the game for anyone who had purchased it online. Ubisoft's solution was to grab a previously issued CD-crack from a warez group and distribute it as a fix.

Nothing, however, beats this latest. Beginning with Settlers 7 and Assassin's Creed 2, gamers in single-player mode will be required to maintain a constant Internet connection. If you lose that connection for any length of time or any reason, your game session is terminated. Ubisoft is spinning this as a feature, claiming that by adopting this system, they can offer gamers unlimited installs, cloud-accessible saved games, and the ability to play from any computer. The one point the company didn't mention when it first announced the structure of this system, is that the game doesn't save before it throws you out.


Ubisoft diving for safety from the skeery pirates. Too bad that water's only two feet deep.

Seriously, Who Thought This Was a Good Idea?
Ubisoft apparently believes that its customer base is located entirely within The Butterfly and Bunny Kingdom where Internet connections are impervious, woven as they are from pure sunshine, cuddles, and cloud fluff. In the real world, on the other hand, Internet connections temporarily fail for a dizzying number of reasons. Routers crash, power cords get unplugged, and cables fall (or are yanked) out. Every so often, for no apparent reason, your connection will drop or slow to a crawl and refuse to function properly until you reboot. If you're using wireless, you dodge some of the potential cord issues, but are subsequently subject to the whims of your wireless router, which might decide at any point that it hates you. God help you if there's a microwave between you and the base unit and someone wants popcorn.



We've not even touched on the myriad factors completely outside any consumer's control. Depending on geographical location, the age and quality of the local loop, and how many other customers are in the immediate vicinity (and using the 'Net simultaneously), uptime and quality of service can vary significantly. Ubisoft's FAQ indicates that the company may have made some small allowance for this—the game will "pause"—but there's no word on how long you've got before the game dumps you back to desktop. If your connection is interrupted because of a problem with the company's servers, well, that's just too bad. Out you go.

The other major technical concern is latency. Ubisoft goes to great pains to point out that the verification service uses very little bandwidth, but latency may prove the greater problem. If Ubisoft designed the system sensibly (a dubious possibility, given the aforementioned save "feature,") than the stream of client/server communication won't be ruffled by a huge latency spike or a series of spikes over a short time period. Considering the particulars of the situation and the parties involved, we aren't holding our breath.

Contempt So Thick You Can Churn It Like Butter -
As heavy-handed, ridiculously strict, and unacceptably penalizing as it is, Ubisoft's new DRM scheme is only a symptom of a greater disease. Beyond the question of whether or not the company's system is acceptable (and what might make it more so), looms the real issue—how did this idea get out of brainstorming at all? Ubisoft's executives haven't just forgotten anything they ever knew about gaming, they've violated one of the primary rules of customer service: Do not treat your legitimate customer base like the enemy. Our "reward" for purchasing an upcoming game isn't the ability to install from different locations, it's the privilege of having to maintain a connection in precisely the way Ubisoft requires, or lose your unsaved progress.



There's no trust in Ubisoft's system, a fact the company acknowledges in its FAQ. When asked why there's no Offline Mode option, the company response states: "We know that services such as Steam offer an offline mode but this option is not as efficient in its protection against piracy."

Translation: "We're unwilling to trust you, our legitimate customer, even though the pirates who have actually stolen the game aren't the ones who are hopping through these ridiculous hoops." Ubisoft obviously wasn't interested in developing any sort of compromise that would allow for offline play in certain circumstances; the company couldn't even be bothered to quicksave game content before dumping users back to desktop.

This goes beyond bad form or simple stupidity—it's the sign of a publisher that's become deeply disdainful of the gamers that keep it in business. Rest assured, the feeling is quite likely mutual.
  • | Post Points: 155
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,782
Points 40,575
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: New York
Inspector replied on Sun, Feb 21 2010 8:53 PM

Wow so if you do like half the game and suddenly forget to save your screwed :D. If im on a trip or something with no internet then i can't play... they should come up with a better plan :(

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,072
Points 11,625
Joined: Jul 2009
Joel H replied on Sun, Feb 21 2010 10:29 PM

It's been four years since Ubisoft killed StarForce--I don't think anyone actually expected them to invent something *worse.*

Goes to show someone at Ubisoft believes in beating other people's expectations.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 104
Points 865
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: California
M-ManLA replied on Mon, Feb 22 2010 12:22 AM

This is sad. Really sad. Games like this I even wonder if I should buy, and I don't play games like this on my PC. I don't like the motto to treat your customers like crap.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,821
Points 45,700
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Mon, Feb 22 2010 2:38 AM

Bye Bye Ubisoft.

OS:Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
MB:ASUS Z87C
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4770 ***
GPU:Geforce GTX 770 4GB
Mem:***ingston 16384MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 639
Points 7,630
Joined: Jul 2009
ClemSnide replied on Mon, Feb 22 2010 4:43 AM

I took a look at their Assassin's Creed game-like product for the iPhone. The crap doesn't stop at the DRM. You spend more time fighting the controls than you do playing. Suffice it to say they won't get my 99¢ any time soon (oh, it's probably more than that, anyway).


"I didn't cry when Bambi's mother was shot... but I cried when HAL was turned off."

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,181
Points 90,135
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: United States, Virginia
Moderator

Another great game that I won't be playing because of the bad DRM. Sad thing is when PC gamers don't buy it partly because of the really bad DRM they will blame it on piracy.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,577
Points 103,215
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Mon, Feb 22 2010 9:09 AM

Argh!,.....Wait a while,... the Pirates will fix it, 'Matey"!

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,372
Points 80,290
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: United States, Arizona
Moderator

indeed, have they not learned yet that for every piece of drm they make someone always brakes it....

"Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window."

2700K

Z77 GIGABYTE G1.SNIPER

GIGABYTE GTX670

G.Skill Ripjaws X 16gb PC2133

Antec P280

Corsair H100

Asus Blu-ray burner

Seasonic X650 PSU

Patriot Pyro 128gb SSD

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 210
Points 2,845
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: Kansas
shanewu replied on Mon, Feb 22 2010 3:37 PM

Wait, am I the only one in "The Butterfly and Bunny Kingdom where Internet connections are impervious, woven as they are from pure sunshine, cuddles, and cloud fluff"?!?

LOL - nicely done, Joel.

"Everyone always wants new things. Everybody likes new inventions, new technology. People will never be replaced by machines. In the end, life and business are about human connections. And computers are about trying to murder you in a lake. And to me, the choice is easy." - Michael Scott (The Office)

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,851
Points 40,550
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: United States, New York
Moderator

I agree that the pirates will fix this issue.  What I don't understand is that we could always install a game on numerous computers, and yet they think you need to be connected to the net in order to do that.  You can also take a copy of your save and put it on another computer.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,072
Points 11,625
Joined: Jul 2009
Joel H replied on Tue, Feb 23 2010 1:24 PM

Mental,

No, you can't. One of the newfound DRM restrictions on a lot of modern games is that you can only install it to so many computers before you have to call in and validate the install (at best) or the game just flat won't let you install it again. Spore is one example.

Also, while you can physically carry or copy a save from Computer A to COmputer B, keeping your saves in the cloud lets you access *all* of them no matter where you are.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,821
Points 45,700
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Tue, Feb 23 2010 3:21 PM

And the Ubisoft jet gets hit by a ballistic missile and goes down in flames.

OS:Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
MB:ASUS Z87C
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4770 ***
GPU:Geforce GTX 770 4GB
Mem:***ingston 16384MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 29
Points 265
Joined: Feb 2010
Komando_93 replied on Tue, Feb 23 2010 11:34 PM

If people didn't have to rampantly pirate PC games so much we would have more exclusive titles and we would never have seen annoyances like this which only serve to slow the pirating while annoying the rest of us

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,053
Points 60,700
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Sat, Feb 27 2010 4:42 PM

I couldn't agree with you more, Joel.

UbiSoft just made my "do not buy" list. They seem to forget that many of us who *won't* resort to piracy will still spend our money on a different game altogether rather than put up with DRM.

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 498
Points 6,040
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: South Carolina

That's a bad move on Ubisoft's part. I bet this will force more PC gamers to buy upcoming titles for console platforms. That's unfortunate, as games on the PC are more aesthetically pleasing than it's console counterpart, and so on....

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (16 items) | RSS