ATI Radeon HD 5450: DX11 On The Cheap

rated by 0 users
This post has 13 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,393
Points 1,192,595
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Wed, Feb 3 2010 11:27 PM

Over the course of the past four months or so, AMD has been on a tear, releasing a slew of new DirectX 11-class GPUs at price points ranging from approximately $600 all the way on down to about $100. All the while, AMD was also up front about the release schedule for many upcoming, future products. If you remember back to some of our previous Radeon HD 5000 series coverage, we showed you a picture of this slide, that outlined AMD's plans to launch the GPUs codenamed Redwood and Cedar sometime in Q1 2010. Redwood became the Radeon HD 5670 and today we can finally spill the beans on the first iteration of Cedar.

Now, 135 days after the arrival of the Radeon HD 5870, AMD is at the ready with the antithesis of that card, the Radeon HD 5450. Whereas the Radeon HD 5870 is AMD's fastest and most powerful single GPU, the Radeon HD 5450 is the low-power, entry-level variant of the Radeon HD 5000 series GPU architecture. As you'd probably expect, the Radeon HD 5450 supports DX11 (of course), along with ATI Eyefinity technology, AVIVO, PowerPlay and all of the other features inherent to the HD 5000 series...


The Half-Height, Passively Cooled, ATI Radeon HD 5450

  • | Post Points: 140
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,838
Points 45,830
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Thu, Feb 4 2010 12:50 AM

Yeah they seem to introduce at least 1 or 2 GPU's a month at least, since the 5870 hit. I just wonder when in Nvidia is going to answer. We have been waiting forever for them to drop a GPU. I have actually been an ATI user for quite some time, although I have had Nvidia cards a few times. Lol, as I mentioned once before I Have an ATI all in Wonder Pro sitting on my dresser in a magnetic bag, It is a first year release from a long time ago. Either way though I like Nvidia to have there capability in the market for 2 reason, if they sufficiently tear ATI up performance wise I could buy one, and it seems to make ATI keep it to the grindstone as well as keeping prices reasonable. The current market has not see a true new Nvidia card for quite some time now.

OS:Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit
MB:ASUS Z87C
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4770 ***
GPU:Geforce GTX 770 4GB
Mem:***ingston 16384MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,109
Points 38,260
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
acarzt replied on Thu, Feb 4 2010 1:38 AM

LOL! Marco you really wailed on that card lol Not a single low res benchmark lol Nothing you threw at it was playable, which brings up the point... Why have a card that supports a cutting edge tech like DX11 if it can't actually run games at playable frame rates? lol I understand the marketing point of view on it... but it seems kind of pointless to support DX11.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 159
Points 1,365
Joined: Oct 2009
Schmich replied on Thu, Feb 4 2010 3:32 AM

DX11 isn't only about gaming applications and I'm sure it's easier for them to keep DX11 as it's on the same architecture. Eyfinity isn't only used for gaming either. I can only assume it's up to 3 screens which would be perfect as a cheap office card for those requiring that amount of monitors.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,964
Points 25,705
Joined: Sep 2009

@acarzt I was thinking the same thing. What's the point of Eyefinity if your graphics card can barely handle high resolution gaming? I was a little disappointed with the drop in performance from the 5870 to the 5670, but the 5450 seems generations behind the 5670!

@Schmich True, that's a plus I hadn't considered. This will make a good media center video card, and good for triple display for office monitors.

ATI has filled in the spectrum in the low to lower-middle GPU section, but they have only three cards that perform better than the GTX 260, the 5850, 5870 and 5970. While Nvidia currently has five that perform better than the 5770, the GTX 260, 275, 280, 285 and 295.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,361
Points 48,680
Joined: Apr 2000
Location: United States, Connecticut
ForumsAdministrator
MembershipAdministrator
Marco C replied on Thu, Feb 4 2010 9:52 AM

Don't forget, DX11 support also means support for DirectCompute, so a card like this would be great for an HTPC that's used to so some video encoding, etc.

Marco Chiappetta
Managing Editor @ HotHardware.com

Follow Marco on Twitter

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 123
Points 1,695
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Mountainy Virginia
Bighorse replied on Thu, Feb 4 2010 10:49 AM

This card is more of HTPC card not much any kind of game. But you figured even the low end model would put up some better numbers for gaming. Many users do flock to the budget cards to help increase their fps even a little without trying to break their bank.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,964
Points 25,705
Joined: Sep 2009

Marco C:

Don't forget, DX11 support also means support for DirectCompute, so a card like this would be great for an HTPC that's used to so some video encoding, etc.

 

Hmm, that's the feature that helps with order-independent transparency and raytracing.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,109
Points 38,260
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
acarzt replied on Thu, Feb 4 2010 6:22 PM

DirectCompute is actually supported on DX10 cards. It was just introduced with DX11.

http://www.nvidia.com/object/directcompute.html

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,053
Points 60,715
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Thu, Feb 4 2010 7:43 PM

At the very least, it gets points for a very cool looking heat-sink. :)

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,109
Points 38,260
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
acarzt replied on Fri, Feb 5 2010 10:05 PM

Well it seems to be THE ONLY half height AMD\ATI card that I can find that supports DirectCompute... so it gets points for that....

But Nvidia has a rather large range of half heights cards that support DirectCompute.

Sooooo AMD\ATI needs to step up their game :-P

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,677
Points 24,005
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

So if you have any inclination of playing games released in the past 5 years on this thing - get another card!  Some people like mild gaming in their HTCP's, but I guess that's what the 5670 is for.

Hello

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,109
Points 38,260
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
acarzt replied on Sat, Feb 6 2010 2:10 PM

I wasn't away that card came in a low profile confiruration.... Either way.. you can pick up a half height GTS250 which will blow away the card in this article.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814187098

Or you could opt for a 9800GT which looks suspiciously the same lol...

with 512MB less ram and a $25 cheaper price tag.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814187061&cm_re=9800_gt-_-14-187-061-_-Product

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 3
Points 45
Joined: Feb 2010
Man-Driva replied on Sat, Feb 6 2010 11:23 PM

Since many of us are convinced PC gaming is all but dead this level of performance has a strongly growing market amongst those that us PC's for other entertainment purposes, video, photography, research,Older games that still have play value .....most pre 2009

Computers have become like toasters pretty much any modern unit can do daily computing tasks well, which frees the consumer on price .....Ego be damned I want something that does the job cost effectively.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (14 items) | RSS