Despite Yield Problems, GPU Sales Surged in Q4 2009

rated by 0 users
This post has 3 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 24,851
Points 1,115,035
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Tue, Jan 26 2010 4:26 PM
Data from Jon Peddie Research confirms the positive GPU sales information we've heard from AMD of late, with the GPU market as a whole growing by 14.7 percent in Q4 as compared to Q3, and 10.3 percent for the entire year. Intel led the quarter in both market share and increased unit shipments, thanks partially to the joint impact of Atom chipset sales and its new Clarkdale processors, which JPR is calling CIGs (CPU integrated graphics.) Since Intel effectively owns both categories and Atom's effect on the mobile market has been additive rather than disruptive, Intel's overall volume was boosted for the period in question. In future quarters, Intel's CIG graphics shipments are expected to commensurately reduce its IGP sales, particularly as the company phases out the Core 2 Duo product lines.

Market share percentages and year-on-year shifts for the top three GPU manufacturers are shown below.


 All three vendors increased their total volume of shipments in absolute terms, including NVIDIA. Despite the company's 6.3 percentage point loss of market share, its total unit volume grew 47.3 percent year-on-year. AMD's ratio was even better—while Sunnyvale captured just 0.6 percentage points of additional market share, its unit volume was up 91.5 percent.

Broken down by form factor, AMD gained integrated mobile GPU market share but slipped in discrete in both desktop and mobile. NVIDIA's share of the discrete desktop market grew in the fourth quarter, despite the fact that both companies have been hamstrung by TSMC's yield problems at 40nm, but Team Green reportedly lost ground in both the desktop and laptop integrated markets.

The 2009 sales figures mark the eighth straight year of volume growth in the GPU market, from a total of 180.6 million graphics chips shipped in 2002 up to 425.4 million in 2009.
  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,796
Points 45,500
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Tue, Jan 26 2010 4:36 PM

I was part of that I guess by buying my 5850. I am really wondering where it's going to go (GPU development). I think it's going to be an interesting year on that front. Nvidia is supposed to release there behemoth sometime in the first 2 quarters I am assuming. If there previous development points to anything I would not doubt ATI will also do so by Q3 at the latest as well.

 Machine name: rapid1
 Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7600) 
 System Model: Gigabyte X58A-UD5
 Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU         930  @ 2.80GHz (8 CPUs), ~3.6GHz
 Memory: Kingston 6144MB RAM
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,963
Points 25,700
Joined: Sep 2009

I understand that Intel's IGP still counts as GPU, but Intel's numbers are skewing the data. An Nvidia vs ATI discrete graphics comparison would be much more interesting to see.

The easy explanation for Intel's marketshare is the surge of netbooks hitting the markets. If AMD's CPU-GPU fusion works out, they'll be grabbing a large portion of that pie from Intel next year.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 457
Points 5,945
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Norfolk, VA, USA
Soupstyle replied on Wed, Jan 27 2010 5:24 PM

You can see by this graph why Nvidia pushed for the now ongoing FTC investigation into Intel's IGP practices.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS