I was reading about this yesterday. Intel plans to replace every chip in its server portfolio with 32nm Westmere parts, and do so within the next 3 months.
The demand for these new server chips is high.
Dang Intel is moving at break neck speed. It makes you wonder why really. It is not like I don't appreciatte the technologies merit as I do. However; AMD may be "some" competition (I know there parts are basically competitive), but they (AMD) don't have anything that in any serious way outperforms them more than a pinch if that. Please don't get me wrong the desktop has an AMD processor. My laptop has an Intel processor but that all they offered in a gateway FX laptop.
As far as it goes Intel's main competition has been Intel for a couple of years. So it's kind of like a dog chasing his tail in many aspects.
Haha, there's no sugarcoating it. Intel's performance is ahead of AMD's. While AMD has been expanding into the budget to performance systems, Intel has remained the enthusiast's choice.
Nehalem-EX will be fastest server chip at its release.
That's true but they are also still really there own competition.
I will make one observation though a server processor with a gpu on board rather than 4 or more cpu cores seem like a short sighted decision to me.
I mean when looking at a server or corporate cpu do you think the rep is looking for a GPU as mpst server boards already have gpu's in the and if not it would seem cheaper to me to have more cores epsecially at 32nm and grab a cheap gpu on the type of system a zeon would generally go into.
I could see these working on workstations but it would seem an excessive expense unless it was for graphic design or something. Of course then you would have a better GPU and 4 cores would be better as well.
I personally think Intel is making a mistake on this unit as well as over expanding there market to much. I appreciate there commitment to diversity, but think they are really going to end up hurting themselves more than anything with such a wide grasp processor wise. How many cpu's of differing capabilities can you get from them right now? Like I said in another subject post not only are they there largest competitor, the general user and the business segments of the market are the money area. With so many choices especially in the general usage portion people have no clue what to get when given 20 choices or more of very specific capabilities with the same general name (Intel CPU).
Say I am a general or business user I am looking at a choice of a core2 duo a coreduo either of multiple varieties, an I3-I5-core2quad-i& of two differing chip compatibilities, about 4 Xeon varieties with anywhere from 1.3 ghz to 3.8 and also there mobile equivalences of most of these and a specialized sector with a GP on board as well I know nothing but general info on computers so what do I choose this is like coke having 40 colas in a regular and diet variety I am going to be so confused as to what to get I am either going to choose the cheapest or just generally grab one oh and don't forget there value line as well there layout of available cpu's is confusing to me much less a general user
Edit button not working? jk lol
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2014 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms