Here's the problem I have with this: When telco's charge based on usage, they never *ever* charge at remotely reasonable rates.
Remember the kid that recently got the $22,000 cellphone bill because he didn't have an unlimited data plan. Do you think Verizon actually provided him with $22,000 worth of service in that month? Did they even provide him with 1/100th that? 1/1000th?
That's what I want - to be charge 100,000% markup on the actual cost of a service from a vendor that locks me into their plans and equipment.
It's no wonder Verizon didn't pursue the case, if more people realized what they're doing we'd have the government regulating their pricing down to below insanely-greedy levels. AT&T might remember that before they introduce their usage-based model.
What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?
This stuff is the reason we chose not to go with the smart phone option so far. Of course this really has nothing to do with this exactly. However; the added 30-50 bucks per phone monthly is just pointless to me. We have computer availability anywhere we are except when we are going out. I can't justify it with that as the only need.
It makes sense to me. Wireless bandwidth is finite, so it seems reasonable to charge people based on how much of the wireless bandwidth they use.
And wireless service is far from a monopoly. Between Verizon, AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, etc. I expect there will be the usual competition for business. None of them will be able to set unreasonably high rates.
Great point 3vi1. And lets not forget the psychological component. Most parents would rather pay $20 and never have to worry about their kids' data usage. That extra few dollars not only buys you unlimited data but peace of mind.
If you try to isolate the bandwidth hogs on one end, you'll end up alienating the rest of your customers. And if the number is as paltry as 3%, it doesn't make any sense to do so.
Agreed. The data plan is a bit overpriced, especially if you spring for the Iphone.
Lets hope so jwilliams as it is now at 360 per phone as a minimum price for a data plan it is just to much considering with two it almost a grand plus your cost for wireless service you already pay.
>> it seems reasonable to charge people based on how much of the wireless bandwidth they use.
And as a bonus, if I don't like someone I can just start forging 64k pings to them until they're bankrupt.
If this is a concern for you, you might want to look for a plan that has a cap on monthly usage. Or a provider that scans for and filters out such abuse.
Remember text spammers? Yeah, I had to change my phone number once because of that.
360 what, dollars? Per month?
3% of users, but 40% of usage. I don't think 40% is paltry. I wouldn't mind paying 40% less!
Don't forget the initial $100-200 you'd have to pay for the Iphone.
@jwilliams He means $30/month x 12 months = $360.
Now if you have a corporate account, you can get as much as 25-30% off that, like my family did.
If they want to offer an unlimited plan and then ding people for over-using that 'UNLIMITED' plan,...then they should allow those people a free contractual 'OUT' of the plan as well. But they will not. They like the fact that they can get away with locking people into a contract for two years at a time and being BARELY responsible for their own performance for that time. All the Cell companies get away with way too much to suit me.
Rely on big corporations to redefine the English language (unlimited means limited folks!) to suit their greed.
Don't part with your illusions. When they are gone you may still exist, but you have ceased to live.
Verizon will never let you out of a contract. I'm pretty sure they make most of their money because people get out of contracts. So it seems fitting that they would charge for the bandwidth you use. I wonder what the stance is of the other service providers.
I took advantage of this offer on day one for my family share plan We will see how it goes. I did not go the umimited route though I got the combo voice text at 1400 mintutes with a data plan "Required on one phone ".
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2014 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms