can't wait to see some products and some numbers!
Core i7 920|EVGA X58|GTX 660 TI & 460se for PHYSX|2x30GB Vertex RAID0|5x1.5TB RAID5
-- Certifications --
CompTIA A+; CompTIA Network+ ; CompTIA Security+; Microsoft Certified Professional(MCP); Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator(MCSA); Microsoft Certified Sysems Engineer(MCSE); Certified Wireless Network Administrator (CWNA); Certified Wireless Security Professional (CWSP); Aruba Certified Mobility Associate (ACMA);
I'm not sure this is really great news. I hate to see Rambus profit after the garbage they pulled with JEDEC (getting their patented tech included in the standard).
Of course, I hold grudges longer than the average elephant.
What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?
I'm hard-pressed to think of a way in which this could actually come to market in a mainstream-sorta way. It's been ten years since Intel tried to cajole/push/coerce the Dramurai into manufacturing RDRAM and turning it into the next-generation solution for the P4 and then-future products.
Who comes out the bad guy and who the good guy depends entirely on who you believe, but there were legitimate technological and economic factors that made it difficult for RDRAM to find its footing. Some of these may have been addressed in the time since then, but manufacturing XDR instead of DDR3 would presumably still require new equipment, different module testing hardware, new chipsets, new integrated memory controllers, etc, etc.
>> Who comes out the bad guy and who the good guy depends entirely on who you believe
True. But, no "standard" should be encumbered by patents, much less "designed to only work if using patented technology". My impression, from what I know (though I do *not* claim to know it all), is that Rambus acted in bad faith and that they should therefore be ostracized.... that their patents should be avoided and leapfrogged.
Agreed, there is too much inertia behind current standards. Intel learned this with RDRAM and likely wouldn't go down that path again. And if Intel isn't going there, frankly rest of the market will only go there in niche areas at best.
Editor In Chiefhttp://hothardware.com
The reason that their technology didn't take off years ago is because they wanted way too much for licencing fees. The gouge was on and Taiwan wasn't playing that tune. So they went down another path and we ended up with DDR and so on. Their own greed kept them from being a big player in the marketplace. Rambus RAM was faster and very reliable but it was frighteningly expensive to buy. I just worked on a system with that stuff in it and it's so old it's 'growing hair' on it. But it still works well.
Don't part with your illusions. When they are gone you may still exist, but you have ceased to live.
Hey its really good, Thanks for sharing this update with us.
lol... oh boy... We always seem to get an abundance of these kind of comments when the contests roll around lol
Yes we do, there's always spam and bump post, there's a complaint thread in feed backs xD
Oh yeah Realneil Rambus was a total bugger . The component ram was actually really good especially compared to the current EDO of the time. There was just several hoops to jump through and the price was exorbitant.
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2013 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms