News:When the rules go into effect, all new 42" sets sold in the CA must use less than 183 watts, and less than 116 watts by 2013. Wondering just how wild that is? A sample 42" Hitachi plasma that was sold in 2007 uses 313 watts, while a 42" Sharp LCD drew 232 watts.
I predict LCD's will have no trouble, but this might kill plasma.
SPAM-posters beware! ®
Will OLED be available in larger sizes by that time? I doubt it, and I think Dave's right about it being the death of plasma, at least for California residents.
I really hate California... way to ruin it for the rest of us! A$$holes!
Core i7 920|EVGA X58|GTX 660 TI & 460se for PHYSX|2x30GB Vertex RAID0|5x1.5TB RAID5
-- Certifications --
CompTIA A+; CompTIA Network+ ; CompTIA Security+; Microsoft Certified Professional(MCP); Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator(MCSA); Microsoft Certified Sysems Engineer(MCSE); Certified Wireless Network Administrator (CWNA); Certified Wireless Security Professional (CWSP); Aruba Certified Mobility Associate (ACMA);
Great, it will drive up costs more. Customers should want lower power consumption because it saves money on their bill. If they don't take that into consideration for the research that is their problem.
It should be the consumer's choice to buy a low power consumption TV. Just like in the world of computers, you're gonna have to sacrifice capability to get lower power consumption.
You not gonna run a Ion system and expect to game like you would be able to with a Core i7 and a top of the line Nvidia or AMD GPU. Remember... a 300Watt power supply used to be considered big! Now 300watts is barely enough to power anything!
With TVs we're gonna have to sacrifice image quality for lower power consumption. I'd rather have my great image quality and high energy bill.
If there is a silver lining AT ALL around this... it is that it might push OLEDs to market sooner. That or everyone is gonna go the way of LED lit LCDs. But they probably won't have local dimming... i'd imagine that takes a lot of processing power and a lot of LEDs to accomplish... so it would null the benifit is using LEDs to save power.
It wouldn't be cost effective for them to make a California only energy efficient line AND the ones that have great picture quality and ignore power limitations.
Dave, this is just a good way to increase taxes on consumer electronics. while hiding behind a green agenda.
Look for similar limitations on other electronics.
NEWS TIPS |
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2013 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms