Fusion-io ioXtreme PCI Express SSD, Tested and Burned In

rated by 0 users
This post has 9 Replies | 4 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 25,873
Points 1,172,860
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2009 9:24 AM
The first time we looked at Fusion-io's ioDrive product, we offered the notion that it was a "disruptive technology", something that had the potential to set the industry on its ear.  Of course the ioDrive is an enterprise-class product that showed the significant potential of PCI Express direct-attached SSD storage but its cost structure was such that the mainstream market couldn't possibly even begin to justify it, no matter what the upside performance looked like.  And then of course we heard of Fusion-io's more consumer-targeted play, the ioXtreme, which debuted at E3 this past summer. Obviously, E3 is a consumer electronics entertainment venue so it became abundantly clear that Fusion-io wasn't only productizing their technology for the enterprise space but for the enthusiast, workstation professional and power user as well. 
Today we've got a full deep-dive look at Fusion-io's ioXtreme PCI Express Solid State Drive.  Weighing in at a pricey $899 for 80GB (standard card), it's definitely still a high ticket item but it's at least approachable now, for those of you that have the need for speed as they say.  Just how much speed?  And what about RAIDing a couple of these bad boys together?  We aim to quantify that for you, as well as a couple of the product's early release caveats, in the pages ahead.
  • | Post Points: 65
Not Ranked
Posts 2
Points 25
Joined: Nov 2009
Ellem replied on Mon, Nov 16 2009 12:22 PM

That is so sick! I've already ordered the package of both!

Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,094
Points 38,120
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
acarzt replied on Mon, Nov 16 2009 7:19 PM

Well now with Sata 6.0Gbps coming to market hopefully we'll be able to see these kind of speeds out of 2.5" drives. Or maybe someone will FINALLY make an awesome 3.5" drive. It would be a smart next move in this market I would think. Not sure why no one has done it yet. You can fit more hardware in a 3.5" drive. Which would mean, more speed and higher capacity. And with a new bus I would think that would = pure awesome :-)

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,964
Points 25,705
Joined: Sep 2009

$11/GB is just way way too much. The extra speed doesn't justify the price bumb from cheaper SSDs.

Still, having "Upto 700MB/sec read speeds" will make you happy like a fat kid on cake.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 27
Points 345
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: New Brunswick, NJ, USA
martin_nj replied on Tue, Nov 17 2009 1:51 PM

I also ordered TWO of that package!!!

 

jk jk - this is a huge ripoff as I don't have ANYTHING that could benefit from this speed.

~~Dell Laptop , D520, Core2Duo @ 2.0Ghz undervolted to 1.0v

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,577
Points 103,200
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Tue, Nov 17 2009 7:11 PM

Yeah, I ordered four of them so I could power my 486 DX40 in a new way.

It's probably not compatible with the 8088,...................

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 8
Points 85
Joined: Sep 2009
Fanfoot replied on Fri, Nov 20 2009 8:41 PM

I mus t be the only one who's not getting these things.

They said they would be bootable, but they're not.  So for TYPICAL users, who's biggest value proposition is to use an SSD as their boot/application drive, this is massively less useful than if it was bootable. 

And as acarzt noted, SATA 6.0 Gbps is coming soon, and in fact you can buy a SATA 6.0 Gbps PCIe card (which also has USB 2.0 ports on it) from ASUS for only $30.  Since many current SSDs are likely maxed out by the SATA 3.0 Gbps limits, this may change things sigificantly once SSDs with SATA 6.0 start shipping.

These cards have worse random access characterstics than the Intel drives.

These cards are using rather more CPU than they should.  It isn't just scaling with the performance increase vs. an SSD.  Its something like double that.  Why?  And that's even before you're forced to use software RAID which will make things worse.

An obvious alternative in a week would be to buy some OCZ Collosus 3.5" drives.  They're supposed to be $300 each for 128GB.  And unlike the Fusion, the Collosus CAN boot the system and CAN use hardware RAID.  For $1200 you could buy FOUR of these and configure them in hardware RAID 0.  Which would mean you've effectively got EIGHT logical SSDs going in parallel.  Sure that likely doesn't make a lot of sense but it would be cheaper than the Fusion-io and have over six times the storage, as well as supporting hardware RAID, etc.

Why is this so great again?  Its about to be overcome by the thundering herd of follow-ons to existing SSDs in traditional form factors that will sell in numbers that will dwarf this thing and put this company out of business.

Buy one for an Enterprise database application?  Sure.  For typical users, I still don't get it.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,094
Points 38,120
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
acarzt replied on Fri, Nov 20 2009 11:50 PM

they were being sarcastic lol

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 8,577
Points 103,200
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
MembershipAdministrator
Moderator
realneil replied on Sat, Nov 21 2009 7:48 AM

MY POST WAS DRIPPING SARCASM

 

Even though SATA-6 is not as wild a woolly as is was meant to be,...........(it's just a specification at this point and any new SATA-6 drives on the market today do not achieve sustained 600 MB speeds) it's being touted as the new holy grail of computing. But so far It doesn't work at anywhere near the speeds it's supposed to.

These PCI-E cards are nowhere near where they should be in performance either,  for the price they're asking for them. (like SATA-6) It's the "New-Tax" I think, and most of us don't play that crap because we find ourselves based in financial reality. These cards are too frigging much money. The only people you'll hear crowing about them are people with a lot of money to play with or folks who get to test/review them for free. Yes, right now, Intel SSD's out perform these in some ways, but they are way too expensive also.

I think that the whole drive performance landscape will be drastically changed in two years time and that it will be time for us mainstream guys to hop aboard the truly high speed express.

(before you reply to this post folks, I realize that these drives are allot faster than what I have now)

Dogs are great judges of character, and if your dog doesn't like somebody being around, you shouldn't trust them.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 3,094
Points 38,120
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
acarzt replied on Wed, Nov 25 2009 12:44 AM

I have a pair of OCZ vertex drives in a RAID 0 and I hit read speeds of 400MB/s.... these things(the drives being reviewed) are Twice as fast by themselves and 3x as fast when raided!

I see little to no delay when opening programs. Everything Operates smoothly. Games when installed from the disc are just as slow as they would be on any other hard drive... Simply because my SSDs can  write faster than my ODD can read lol Games installed after being downloaded from the web.... watch out cuz those install crazy fast! lol

As far as in game load times... I really don't notice a difference between a normal disc drive and SSD. The SSDs definitely provide some nice performance advantages... But right now, it's really not worth the money lol These things are a High performance peice of equipment.... but there advantages apply more to moving massive amounts of data from one point to an other. They don't seem to offer much advantage in what a typical user will user them for. These drives aren't even meant to be constantly moving data, which is what they're good at, because the more you move around files, the quicker they are gonna die/slow down.

Of course I say all of this now, but if I switched over to a HDD base system i'd be complaining about how slow it is! lol

And before you ask... the OS and all programs and games are installed on the SSDs. All things like music, pictures, video, etc is stored on my 750GB HDD. I also have a 250GB HDD with nothing on it... I need to start ripping some DVDs lol.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (10 items) | RSS