Nothing fancy here, and I doubt it's future proof. Especially since you don't know what will happen in the future for computers.
Yeah, "futureproof" is an odd term, though I imagine it's more of a spectrum than an absolute. "More likely to be useful on future generations" is a better way to put it. If CoolIt has been privy to ATi plans, though, the chances are good that this unit will work with at least the next few years' worth of designs. (Which isn't as impressive as it sounds. ATi's prospective releases have a lot of low-end and mainstream cards, none of which is going to be terated to a water cooler.)
I take it also that this is just a GPU cooler. I wonder can this be hooked into a CPU cooling block? I was planning on air cooling, but if the premium is not that much, I'd look into water.
"I didn't cry when Bambi's mother was shot... but I cried when HAL was turned off."
Clem,
I'm going to make predictions on future models based on ATI's 4000 series.
The 5870 launched in September. We can reasonably assume that ATI will refresh the 5870 at some point with a "5890," (aka, same architecture, faster single-card offering). If the company follows roughly the same launch schedule as it did with the HD 4K cards, it'll launch a 5890 6-9 months out from now. (The 4890 launched just under nine months after the 4870, but I'm allowing for the appearance of a competitive Fermi product, and the possibility that AMD would drop a 5890 in the channel to counter it.)
I'm not going to try to predict exactly when we'll see the HD 6000 series (or whatever they decide to call it), but again, we can assume it'll drop at least six months after the 5890, which puts it at December 2010 at the very earliest.
If we assume that ATI future-proofed its GPU physical placement and whatnot, and was able to at least tell CoolIT what the 6K series would need, then we're good through June of 2012 or so--assuming a full 18 months for ATI to launch again.
I think there's a good chance this particular cooler design could be relevant past that timeframe.
Water cooling does beat the heck out of air, but GPU performance is getting to be so striking right out of the box that I wonder if OC'ing is even necessary any more. The factory cooling solution may be good enough at stock speeds considering how the newer cards available today function.
For many of us,....the performance is that good.
Intel DP55KG with Liquid Cooled Intel Core i7 870 CPU @ 3.75GHz
8GB Kingston Hyper-X DDR-3 RAM
2GB GTX-285 Video
2 SATA-II 7200 RPM 1-TB HDD'S in RAID-0
LiteOn 22x DVD±R/±RW DL
LiteOn Blu-Ray Reader
ViewSonic 22" Wide Screen LCD Display
Xtreme Gear USB Keyboard
Xtreme Gear USB Mouse
CyberPower 800W Power Supply
CoolerMaster Storm Sniper Gaming Case
Realneil,
Good enough is always relative. I, for one, loathe jaggies, which means I don't just want to play the latest games--I want to play them at 8xAA (jaggies are the bane of my existence) with 16x AF *and* all game detailed maxxed and if DX10 if I can get it. (This last is not a real concern, DX10 being about as valuable as a goat in a tornado, but hey).
If I have to turn those settings down, for whatever reason, then the video card isn't fast enough. I don't buy games for their graphics--Immersiveness, plot, and design count for 10x more than shiny pictures--but if I can't crank everything up 100%, then I'm compromising. Granted, like everybody else, I end up compromising. ;)
>I, for one, loathe jaggies,
Joel-- They prefer to be called "Jaguar-Americans."
HOME | REVIEWS | VIDEOS | IMAGES | FORUMS | BLOGS | SHOP ABOUT | ADVERTISE | RSS/XML | NEWS TIPS | NEWS ARCHIVE
This site is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. The contents are the views and opinion of the author and/or hisassociates. All products and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. All content and graphical elements areCopyright © 1999 - 2009 David Altavilla and HotHardware.com, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms