Intel 34nm X25-M Gen 2 SSD Performance Review

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,687
Points 1,207,130
Joined: Sep 2007
News Posted: Thu, Jul 23 2009 4:23 PM

When Intel released their first generation 50nm SSD product, the market buzzed with appreciation for the product and its overall performance profile. We in fact took you through the ins and outs of Intel's new MLC-based Solid State Drive product line-up for the consumer market and agreed it was one of the fastest on the market at the time. However, over time, other manufacturers have closed the gap significantly. Perhaps it was the fact that Intel had "skin" in the SSD game or maybe it was just the all-around buzz of the burgeoning SSD market in general but there's no question, the technology itself has a considerable resource commitment from a number of very big name manufacturers.

Based on 50nm manufacturing technology, Intel's highly acclaimed line of SSDs have historically commanded a price premium in the market as well, which regardless didn't keep them from selling like hotcakes. However, with the kind of resources that very few manufacturers like Intel can bring to bear, it was abundantly clear that Intel's SSD roadmap would continue to evolve. Today we've got a look at Intel's second generation of SSD products, the recently announced 34nm version of the Intel X25-M SSD. At 160GB and a significantly lower price point, Intel is also claiming performance has been taken up a notch or two as well. Sounds like a proverbial win-win doesn't it? Let's see for ourselves...

Intel 34nm X25-M Gen 2 SSD Performance Review

Update: Intel has found a sighting that impacts users who set a BIOS drive password on the newly released 34nm NAND Flash based Solid State Drives. If a user has set a BIOS drive password on the 34nm SSD, then upon disabling or changing the BIOS drive password followed by powering off/on the computer, the SSD becomes inoperable. However, if the user has not set a BIOS drive password then there is no issue. This erratum does not apply to a computer, network or operating system password.

The root cause has been identified and new fix is under validation. We are expecting to post an end user firmware update to fix this erratum in the next two weeks.

If you have enabled your BIOS drive password, do not disable or change your BIOS drive password. If you have not enabled your BIOS drive password, do not enable a BIOS drive password and visit to update firmware when available.

It made sense to pause shipments and implement the changes ourselves and via customers versus asking consumers to do so. Keep in mind the fix has been identified and validation is undergoing completion over the next week.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,181
Points 90,135
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: United States, Virginia

Nothing unseen in the numbers, but I love the way the price is going.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,849
Points 45,900
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Kennesaw
rapid1 replied on Fri, Jul 24 2009 1:12 PM

     I am glad to see this price structure hitting the market as well as what it means in general. For many, many years now the most unchanged item hardware wise has been the HD. So I am very glad this was initially addressed with the release of SSD's, and now the price line seems to finally be getting friendly. This has been from what I see one of the things that effects speed in general, and also has an effect in general efficiency as well as heat dispersal on a unit basis, and actually makes DDR3 more valid as well. I say that because as the heat dispersal and energy usage slims in a normal desktop or laptop model this will add to that as another factor in main computer decision making.

     This happening and other factors along this line (DDR3 as already mentioned, and CPU power consumption and heat dispersion as well) bode well with the current eye on energy efficiency, usage ratio, cost, and pollution made by the making of this energies(electrical) availability. I am not some energy nut, but I see no point to increased pollution if and where it is unnecessary. With computers becoming the norm as well as higher bandwidth connectivity and therefore usage ratios on a general basis this all makes sense.

     So the general movement of more performance on a general basis at a lower cost point means more general tech. Therefore; more research on making it faster as well as widening the functionality and usage of it in general. With that I as a hardware junkie love to see it move forward as well as the changes it makes in the world in general.

Xonar DGX
Intel Gigabit CT
Geforce GTX 770 4GB
G.Skill X1600/1754 2x8GB 7/8/8/24
  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 3
Points 25
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: China

why does read-speed work so slow??

I prefer to Supertalent.Stick out tongue. they have better devices..


  • Filed under:
  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 29
Points 175
Joined: Sep 2009
Location: Rugby ND
starwhite replied on Mon, Sep 21 2009 2:21 AM

I can see SSDs as being the future. Conventional hard drives are on the way out. I can't wait to get one of these babies!

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS