U.S. Judge Weighs DVD Copying Case

rated by 0 users
This post has 3 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 24,891
Points 1,117,030
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Fri, May 22 2009 3:35 PM

Yesterday, a Federal District Court judge in California heard arguments regarding a DVD copyright case between Hollywood movie companies and RealNetworks. Depending on what the judge rules, you and I may or may not be able to legally copy our own DVD collections to our computers.

In October, U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel temporarily halted sales of RealNetworks' software that allows people to make backups of their DVDs on a home computer. After hearing arguments regarding the case, the judge is expected to issue a written decision. No timeframe for when she might rule has been given.

During the hearings, additional evidence was presented regarding whether RealNetworks violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 and the license it had with the DVD Copy Control Association. The judge is also expected to indicate what she expects will happen if the issue goes to trial.


The movie companies have argued that RealDVD software should be banned because it violates copyright law and encryption methods. The movie companies also claim RealDVD reduces the cost of a DVD to nothing or to the cost of a movie rental because users could borrow a DVD from a friend or rent it and then copy it.

RealNetworks claims DVD owners have a right to make copies of their own DVDs under “fair use.” The company did admit the software could be used for sharing among friends. "Those are cumbersome ways to make copies and those are not the markets we are targeting, but yes, it can happen," said Don Scott, a lawyer for the Seattle-based digital media company. If necessary, RealNetworks is willing to rewrite portions of the code in order to address specific concerns.

Movie studios currently sell their own backup copies of movies. Because the studios hold the copyrights to those movies, they are not violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

If the injunction against RealNetworks' software stands, movie studios stand to benefit from increased sales of digital backup copies. If it fails, the case could open the door for companies to sell software and devices that can store and organize movies from DVDs.

The Hollywood movie companies involved in the case are owned by Walt Disney, Time Warner, Sony, News Corp, Viacom, and General Electric. They are joined by the Motion Picture Association of America and the DVD Copy Control Association.

Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,416
Points 46,585
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Metropolis
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator

News:
In October, U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel temporarily halted sales of RealNetworks' software that allows people to make backups of their DVDs on a home computer.

*Ripped from Wikipedia (read HERE):

A & M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., commonly known as RIAA v. Napster — Judge Patel ruled that Napster was not an ISP in the definition specified by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and thus was not entitled to protection under that law's "safe harbor" provision. Judge Patel's injunction and final ruling (largely upheld on appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit) meant that Napster was responsible for policing its internet file sharing network for materials that violate record companies' copyrights. [1]

 SPAM-posters beware! ®

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,416
Points 46,585
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Metropolis
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator

Would anyone here care to go on record and predict how Judge Patel will rule on this case?Big Smile I am predicting RealNetworks is in RealTrouble!

 

 SPAM-posters beware! ®

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,048
Points 60,675
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Sun, May 24 2009 9:19 PM

I agree with you Dave.

I think it's stupid and wrong, but RealNetworks is set up to lose.

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS