SandForce Delivers Quick SF-1000 SSD Processors

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,187
Points 1,186,095
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Mon, Apr 13 2009 10:48 AM

This may be the first and last time you hear of SandForce, but if you're looking to finally buy into the solid state drive arena within the next few months, you'll probably get acquianted one way or another. You see, SandForce is leaving its self-described "stealth mode" today with the introduction of its unique, hasty line of SSD controllers. The SD-1000 SSD Processor family are highly integrated silicon devices which are said to "address the inherent endurance, reliability, and data retention issues associated with NAND flash memory, making it possible to build SSDs that deliver unprecedented performance over the life of the drive with orders-of-magnitude higher reliability than enterprise-class HDDs."

The secret here is in the patent pending DuraClass technology, which addresses key NAND flash issues allowing MLC flash technologies to be reliably used in broad based, mission critical storage environments. Mike Desens, Vice President for System Design, IBM, even noted that "these innovations can be truly disruptive and will accelerate the adoption of Solid State technologies across the data center." DuraClass technology involves DuraWrite -- which optimizes the number of program cycles to the flash effectively extending flash rated endurance by 80x or more when compared to standard controllers -- and Recycler, which intelligently performs garbage collection with the least impact on flash endurance.



As for specs, the SF-1000 crew features a standard 3 gigabit-per-second SATA host interface connecting up to 512 gigabytes of commodity NAND flash memory, and delivers 30K IOPS (random 4K read or write transfers), and 250MB/s performance (sequential 128KB read or write transfers) with 100 micro-second latency. SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) connectivity is easily achieved via a third-party SAS-SATA bridge available from multiple sources. On the matter of reliability, SF-1000-based SSDs can sustain peak performance for 5-year enterprise lifecycles without artificial daily usage restrictions or costly over-provisioning techniques.



We're told that SF-1000 Enterprise and Mobile Computing SSD Processors will be available in prototype quantities later in the second calendar quarter of 2009, with major OEMs to produce SSDs based on this innovation within the next year.



  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,851
Points 40,550
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: United States, New York
Moderator

So why is it the last time I'll hear about it?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,053
Points 60,715
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Mon, Apr 13 2009 8:13 PM

Because any time you hear about a company with patent-pending technology that demolishes a vague list of hurdles that have supposedly hindered everyone else, it's either A) vaporware, or B) about 20% of what they're promising.

Reading their website, their technology sounds like nothing more than bigger/longer caching, standard wear-level algorithms, and application error correction control to disk storage. They'll probably get sued for violating someones patent.

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

Top 500 Contributor
Posts 136
Points 1,435
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario
yoda8232 replied on Mon, Apr 13 2009 8:26 PM

Wait a hard drive processor?

Never heard of this before.

 

EDIT: Is this just a RAID controller?


Yoda8232
χƒιяє: yodagunit1
є-maιl: yoda8232@yahoo.ca">yoda8232@yahoo.ca



  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,053
Points 60,715
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Mon, Apr 13 2009 9:09 PM

No. Take a look at one of your hard-drives. No... the other side. Look! Chips that control the drive based on IDE/AHCI commands!

Wait... you use SCSI? nm....

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

Top 500 Contributor
Posts 136
Points 1,435
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario
yoda8232 replied on Mon, Apr 13 2009 9:35 PM

No I use SATA lol, like almost everyone else. I still don't get it.


Yoda8232
χƒιяє: yodagunit1
є-maιl: yoda8232@yahoo.ca">yoda8232@yahoo.ca



  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS