Overclocking the FSB alone

rated by 0 users
This post has 3 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 500 Contributor
Posts 111
Points 1,350
Joined: Oct 2008
Jeremy Posted: Thu, Feb 26 2009 2:50 PM

Alright, I'm relatively new when it comes to overclocking, but I've learned and picked up a lot in a short amount of time.  I'm having issues with one aspect of it, however.  First, let me tell you my pertinent system specs:

Intel QX9650

Gigabyte P45 motherboard

8GB DDR2 memory on 4 sticks

GTX260 (192)

The stock configuration for this system is a 333 MHz FSB with a 9x multiplier for 3.0 GHz.  I've pushed it to 333 x 10.5 for 3.50 GHz on the stock box cooler and stock voltage (can't bump voltage due to temp concerns).  Memory runs at 533 MHz on an 8:5 divider.

 

Now, the question.  Since the processor has an unlocked multiplier, I can fairly easily set the processor to run at just about any speed I desire.  Is there any real difference between using a 400 mHZ FSB and a 333 MHz in terms of system speed?  Is there any benefit to overclocking the FSB if the processor and memory wind up at the same speeds?  Here's an example:

Setup A: 333 x 12 = 4.0 GHz CPU clock, memory on 8:5 divider for 533 MHz

Setup B: 400 x 10 = 4.0 GHz CPU clock, memory on 4:3 divider for 533 MHz

Is one setup any faster than the other?  Are there any advantages to a higher FSB clock in the case of Extreme Edition processors?  Every guide out there deals with overclocking "regular" processors with locked multipliers, so this is one question I haven't been able to find an answer for.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,225
Points 31,760
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: United States, New York
Moderator

If I do remember correctly, increasing the fsb is more of a performance gaining OC, rather than just bumping up the multi.

 

Does anyone else feel like recommending Boa's guid to OCing right now? (I had the urge to say it.)

 

[edit] Now that I think of it you could look up how to OC an AMD based cpu they all have unlocked multi's.  It you want an easy breakdown look for an AMD 2500+ OC guide.  There is one on here that was created by Boa, who is the person i referenced before.  He has a great guide.  It's from around 2005 so it will be a bit dated, but that will give you the right idea.

 

Also you have to physically change the cpu's fsb and multi to give yourself a good idea of the gains by using benchmarks and so on.  you should start with the stock times and work your way up from there.  Happy OCing!

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,675
Points 57,685
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: United States, California/Arizona
Moderator

Setting your multi will allow you to then get your ram and FSB running 1:1 much easier. What speed is your memory? If you can set the FSB and Multi to match the ram then you will be set.

For example my DDR2-800 runs at 400 MHz I have under clocked my ram to at 366; so that it runs 1:1 with my FSB. My Milti is stuck at 9 (on my E6600) so take 9 x the FSB (366) I get 3.294 Ghz. Ideally you would like to have your ram and FSB run at 1:1.

"Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window."

Core i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz

Evga X58

Evga 275 FTW (SLI)

G.Skill DDR3 1600 6GB

Corsair 128GB SSD

Corsair 1000W PSU

Noctua NH-U12P

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,249
Points 77,735
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: United States, Virginia
Moderator

http://www.nordichardware.com/Guides/?page=1&skrivelse=517 Benchmarking a Core2Quad at the same clockspeed, but different multiplier and FSB settings. Short answer yes you do get a speedbump in some things.

Also I miss Boa. I bought a 512mb stick of Kingston HyperX memory from him. I thought I had sooo much memory. My mobo was single channel.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS