The Best and Worst Places to Work

rated by 0 users
This post has 3 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 26,345
Points 1,191,290
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Tue, Dec 30 2008 12:35 PM

The folks over at Glassdoor.com have been busy mining through their data of user-submitted information and have assembled lists of the best and worst places to work. The lists are based on data from 2008 from almost 75,000 participants, representing over 11,000 companies, from a 20-question survey.

A number of tech companies made significant showings in "The Top 50" best places to work, including Netflix (rank: 3), Adobe (rank: 4), and Google (rank: 7). For a company to be considered for the list, it must have at least 25 user-submitted reviews from U.S.-based employees, "satisfied" or better ratings in all categories, and at least a 50-percent approval rating for its CEO. Because of the requirement of at least 25 employee submissions, very small companies are obviously left out of this running. The top-ranked company, General Mills, has an overall 4.5 out of 5 rating and a 96-percent approval rating for its CEO, Ken Powell.

 Rank
 Company
 Rating
 CEO Approval
 1 General Mills
 4.5 96%
 2 Bain & Company 4.5
 89%
 3 Netflix  4.4 100%
 4 Adobe 4.3 82%
 5 Northwest Mutual
 4.2 98%
 6 Whole Foods
 4.2 85%
 7 Google 4.1 89%
 8 SAP 4.1 75%
 9 Continental Airlines 4.1 79%
 10 NetApp 4.0 79%
 Employer Ratings: 4.51 - 5.0 = "Very Satisfied".   3.5 - 4.5 = "Satisfied"
 The complete list of the Top 50 employers can be found here

For the companies that appeared in the bottom 50 of "Lowest Rated Companies Based on Employee Satisfaction" there were far fewer tech companies and many more retail-based companies. The lowest-ranked company is DHL Express (USA), which is perhaps not much of a surprise that it scored so poorly as the company has pulled out of the U.S. domestic shipping business.



Rank

Company

Rating

CEO Approval

 1 DHL Express (USA)  1.7 N/A
 2 United Airlines
 2.0 12%
 3 Reynolds and Reynolds 2.0 8%
 4 Farmers Group
 2.0 6%
 5 Gibson Guitar    2.1 17%
 6 Radio Shack 2.1 11%
 7 Rain Bird 2.1 9%
 8 CSAA Inter-Insurance Bureau 2.2 12%
 9 Office Depot   
 2.2 4%
 10 Compuware 2.4 16%
 Employer Ratings: 4.51 - 5.0 = "Very Satisfied".   3.5 - 4.5 = "Satisfied"
 The complete list of the bottom 50 employers can be found here

In better economic times many might look at the list of top 50 companies as potential places to try to work for--or avoid the ones on the bottom 50. That still holds true, but with unemployment rising and fewer job opportunities available, this information might in fact better serve employees who are already working for these companies--with the a listing in the top 50 as affirmation that they are working at the right company, and a listing in the bottom 50 as just more confirmation that their employers suck.



  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 5,053
Points 60,715
Joined: May 2008
Location: U.S.
Moderator
3vi1 replied on Tue, Dec 30 2008 5:21 PM

Is it kind of weird that Circuit City was rated only 46th-worst?

Washington Mutual was rated 48th, and their CEO had a 0% approval rating (he got paid $19 million dollars for working three weeks - but I'm sure they were 12-hour days.)

What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" don't you understand?

++++++++++++[>++++>+++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>+++.>++++++++++.-------------.+++.>---.>--.

Not Ranked
Posts 22
Points 235
Joined: Dec 2008

Left HugRight Hug

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,181
Points 90,135
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: United States, Virginia
Moderator

Office Depot here I come. Sounds like a steller place to work.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS