Headphones Can Interfere with Pacemakers: Study

rated by 0 users
This post has 2 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 24,877
Points 1,116,615
Joined: Sep 2007
ForumsAdministrator
News Posted: Tue, Nov 11 2008 11:54 PM

It should be common sense that electronic devices can cause interference with other electronic devices (remember the old pacemaker / microwave problem?). After all, an earlier study about RFID tags interfering with medical devices has been released, and a new study released on Sunday shows that headphones might throw off pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) when placed within an inch of the medical devices.



The presentation, titled Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) of Implanted Cardiac Devices by MP3 Player Headphones was shown at the American Heart Association's annual scientific sessions in New Orleans on Sunday. It took a look at the possible interaction between the magnets in headphones and implanted devices.

The study compared eight different headphones on 60 patients. When the headphones were about an inch from the device, interference was detected in four of the 27 pacemaker patients and 10 of the 33 with defibrillators. A pacemaker reset itself in one patient.

The study's leader, Dr. William Maisel, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston and a heart device consultant to the Food and Drug Administration said:
"Headphones contain magnets, and some of these magnets are powerful. The headphone interaction applies whether or not the headphones are plugged in to the music player and whether or not the music player is on or off."
However, he cautioned that people should not overreact to the news, but he added it would be a good idea to keep small electronics at least a few inches from implanted medical devices.

Nearly 2 million people worldwide have pacemakers, defibrillators or other devices to help regulate their heartbeats. Results of the study, including the models tested, are below:

MP3 Player Headphone Clinical Interactions with PM-ICD
Brand

Model/
Type
Magnetic
Field
Strength
(gauss)*
Clinical Interactions
PM (n=27)ICD (n=33)Total (n=60)
Sony

MDR-Q22LP
(clip-on)
204 (15%)10 (30%)14 (23%)
Phillips

SBC HS430
(clip-on)
102 (7%)1 (3%)3 (5%)
Phillips

SHE5920
(in ear)
4000
Bose

In ear4000
Sony

MDR-E828LP
(in ear)
3000
JVC

HA-F130-A
(in ear)
201 (3%)1 (2%)
Apple

In ear2000
JVC

HA-FX33-A
(in ear)
0000
Total





4 (15%)10 (30%)14 (23%)
* At 2 cm from Gaussmeter



  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,861
Points 24,255
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: United States, New York
digitaldd replied on Wed, Nov 12 2008 9:02 AM

Ok I'm just checking i read this article correctly. If you have a pacemaker don't put your headphones within an inch of it or up to 25% of the time the pacemaker can fail from the EMI. ??

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 119
Points 1,405
Joined: Oct 2008
Jeremy replied on Wed, Nov 12 2008 3:00 PM

I get an error when trying to read the full article, but from what's presented here it sounds as if certain headphones with strong magnets (clip on types in this study, the in ear types only caused 1 interaction) cause "interference". It's difficult to say how they defined interference for purposes of the study, but if it caused the device the fail I'm sure they would've used stronger language.

IOW, the implanted device may not work 100% correctly in the presence of a strong headphone magnet, but it's still gonna work.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS